801
I just cited myself. (mander.xyz)
submitted 4 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
233 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 28 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The only thing this proves is that the fraction-to-decimal conversion is inaccurate.

No number is getting converted, it's the same number in both cases but written in a different representation. 4 is also the same number as IV, no conversion going on it's still the natural number elsewhere written S(S(S(S(Z)))). Also decimal representation isn't inaccurate, it just happens to have multiple valid representations for the same number.

A number which is not 1 is not equal to 1.

Good then that 0.999... and 1 are not numbers, but representations.

[-] bitfucker@programming.dev 8 points 4 months ago

Lol I fucking love that successor of zero

this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
801 points (95.2% liked)

Science Memes

11004 readers
2311 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Sal@mander.xyz
fossilesque@mander.xyz
SciBot@mander.xyz