438
submitted 4 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

South Korea is beginning the mass production of a low-cost laser weapon that has successfully shot down small drones during testing, the country’s key arms agency said Thursday.

The laser weapon, called Block-I, “can precisely strike small unmanned aerial vehicles and multicopters at close range,” a news release from South Korea’s Defense Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA) said.

The release did not give a cost for the weapon, but said each shot fired would only cost about $1.50.

Imagery supplied by the agency appears to show a weapon around the size of a shipping container with a laser mounted on top and what appears to be a radar or tracking device mounted on one side of the platform.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 31 points 4 months ago

What's the kW or MW class of laser? If it's too low, it could be ineffective against even tinfoil wrapped quad copters.

[-] thejml@lemm.ee 26 points 4 months ago
[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 15 points 4 months ago

Imagine getting a massive burn because the drone trying to bomb you reflected the laser your colleague used to try to shoot it down.

[-] CaliforniaSober@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago

This screams UFO encounter.

[-] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

Might still be powerful enough to blind the optics, which would effectively cripple them. Without a video feed neither FPV drones nor grenade-dropping ones would have the necessary precision to be effective.

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago

Unless they're gps guided, or they can turn their camera away from the laser source in time.

[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Unless they’re gps guided

These lower power DEW systems don't target the optics they target propulsion, like the actual rotors themselves. Takes about 1-2 seconds to knock them out on the ISR type drones, maybe a bit longer on the FPV type depending on size.

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

I'd have thought the rotors would be harder to melt though because of their speed and cooling, but I guess it would work. Could you electroplate the rotors?

[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 4 points 4 months ago

Could you electroplate the rotors?

I'm sure you could but the more armor you stack on the more you reduce the performance.

[-] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

GPS wouldn’t be effective at all for drones dropping munitions on infantry moving around on the battlefield, nor on FPV drones trying to fly into moving tanks or other vehicles.

And how do you turn a drone away from an infrared beam of light that would damage the drones optics almost instantly? You’d have to spot the laser system from hundreds of yards away, recognize it’s aimed at your drone, and turn away before the laser is fired. And then what? Just avoid turning your drone back the way you want to go, hoping another strategically positioned laser you didn’t see doesnt fire from a different direction?

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

You'd need to know where the laser system is, yes. You could do that by having a first done get shot at to reveal the position so the others know where not to look.

Gps would still be effective against stationary targets, but gps jamming would probably be very effective.

[-] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

A buck fifty a shot at the rate I pay is about 12 ~~Kwh~~ kwH 😉 of power. That laser has got to be way up there in power.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

kWh

(I'm sorry, I have nitpicking issues.)

[-] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

What a coincidence! I have picnicking issues.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago
[-] lmaydev@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Wouldn't that cut it's communication though?

[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

My coworker and I literally tried wrapping an access point in aluminum foil to replicate poor connectivity. It didn't do shit. Even completely lined a cardboard box and put it inside with zero change.

[-] aniki 6 points 4 months ago
[-] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago

The link provided doesn't say anything about tinfoil or aluminum foil...

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

I don't think so? Radios don't care is a laser is shining at them.

[-] awesome_lowlander@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 months ago
[-] GluWu@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

You could just stick the antenna through the foil. Antennas are just pieces of wire, which can also be made from shiny metal.

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

Oh okay, yeah you'd probably leave the top un-foiled for the radio

[-] lmaydev@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

The tinfoil would stop it.

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 months ago

Yeah I'm no light expert but can't they just make shilding and filters for this sort of attack vector?

[-] frezik@midwest.social 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Depends on the wavelength. Standard mirrors don't always do mirror things at wavelengths far outside the visible spectrum.

Part of the advantages of UAVs is that you can deploy a lot of them cheaply with stuff you buy on eBay. While eBay does sell some of the more exotic mirrors for CO2 laser cutters (which are far-IR wavelengths), you couldn't buy a lot of them to cover a single drone. It'd cut into the cost advantage, and would also weigh it down a lot.

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago

My initial reaction was that it's going to make drones more cost prohibited. Logistics of only deploying unshielded drones where there aren't lasers will probably be a thing now too.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Even if they can, it will decrease the payload somewhat, and as the lasers get better the shielding will have to get stronger.

It'll forever be a back and forth thing

this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
438 points (99.3% liked)

World News

39102 readers
2235 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS