241
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cyd@lemmy.world -4 points 5 months ago

Lots of people seem keen to jump to this being staged. That makes zero sense: Trump was already winning before this, especially with Biden (his preferred opponent) looking to hang on to the nomination.

[-] enbyecho@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Trump was already winning before this

Do you just not understand how elections work? You don't "win" before votes are cast.

[-] cyd@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Are you being wilfully pedantic, or do you not know that it's possible to tell someone is ahead in a contest?

[-] perishthethought@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

Polls are worthless now and response rates are too low to matter.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-can-election-2024-polls-really-tell-us/

Or, is this just your gut talking?

[-] cyd@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Polls have significant predictive power, especially when you poll reportedly and/or aggregate them. Which is why all political campaigns, R or D, spend literally millions running their own polling. Moreover, it's now July, the first convention is literally coming up within days, so the excuse of being "far out from the election" no longer holds.

[-] perishthethought@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

Totally agree with your last statement. I think I was just saying we'll have to wait and see how this turns out.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 5 months ago

winning in the court of public opinion

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Which public? That's their point. It's a snapshot of people that do enter polls. I'm too fuckin busy to take time out of my day for that. But I will vote.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago

the republican voters, obviously.

[-] droopy4096@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

conspiracy theorist in me sees several venues where it is Very beneficial to POTUS45 to stage this:

  • finally come out as victim
  • frame Biden/CIA/FBI as villains
  • come out as "defiant" hero and rally support to the point where it's a landslide win, where he would be able to go after anybody and anything he doesn't like.

more wicked stuff comes to mind but I think above is sufficient . Fact that bullet grazed him and nobody around him in a tight setting is kind of strange, with his bravado on display with fist shaking. One can only dream for this election campaign video to be run on repe 24/7 on fox and other outlets, giving him more air time, and now that Biden asked everyone to read project2025 entire nation will be watching nothing but POTUS45. Still could be some morron that didn't get his signature at the rally pulling out his Beretta..

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Witness statement was that another attendee was shot in the head and killed and a 2nd in the forearm and hand.

[-] droopy4096@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

sounds like, indeed bystanders been hit according to latest information. I still believe that POTUS45 would be OK sacrificing any number of people as long as it gets him power. No evidence of his involvement but entire story "smells"

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

There is no scenario where this helps Treason Trump. Now the entire world knows that Convicted Criminal and Sex Offender Treason Trump is so widely hated that people literally want to kill him. And now Treason Trump knows it too.

this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
241 points (91.4% liked)

politics

19244 readers
2308 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS