241
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Trump's statement on Truth Social:

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump

"I want to thank The United States Secret Service, and all of Law Enforcement, for their rapid response on the shooting that just took place in Butler, Pennsylvania. Most importantly, I want to extend my condolences to the family of the person at the Rally who was killed, and also to the family of another person that was badly injured. It is incredible that such an act can take place in our Country. Nothing is known at this time about the shooter, who is now dead. I was shot with a bullet that pierced the upper part of my right ear. I knew immediately that something was wrong in that I heard a whizzing sound, shots, and immediately felt the bullet ripping through the skin. Much bleeding took place, so I realized then what was happening. GOD BLESS AMERICA!"

[-] Thteven@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago

There is no way in hell he wrote that statement, it's way too coherent.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

I also don't see Trump expressing remorse for anyone else.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

It is incredible that such an act can take place in our Country.

Is it though? There have already been 290 mass shootings in this country this year, so far. And this shooting does not even count among them.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago
[-] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

No it isn't. Trump is a candidate, not a sitting President, so it doesn't count.

All this shit happening is bad enough; can we at least not prematurely crown him?!

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

He is a former President with the same protections afforded to any former President.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

"Afforded protections" is one thing, but that's not the point. The point is that I refuse to let this count as a "Presidential assassination attempt" because he isn't the goddamn President right now; Biden is. And you shouldn't count it as such either -- the only ones who would are MAGA election-denier shitheads.

[-] noisefree@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

It depends on where you draw the line for "attempt" - the Secret Service isn't an exactly candid organization (to put it lightly) and the media/public doesn't spend much time focusing on the foiled plots they do learn about (insert your opinion as to the "why?" here). My own assumption is that the threat vectors against those that are granted Secret Service protection are probably numerous and coming from many different directions.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

It just feels wrong coming from the person who enacted Jan 6th. He caused something just like this and someone died.

this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
241 points (91.4% liked)

politics

19241 readers
1886 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS