1042
submitted 3 months ago by yokonzo@lemmy.world to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bluewing@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

Might as well. The city has already paved over the prime farm land.

[-] spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

The problem is a simple paved lot can be redeveloped into something useful easily. Once there are EV chargers and and solar roofs in place, it's that much harder to break the cycle of car dependency. Places like Walmart/Costco/strip malls are probably better off just placing panels on the roof instead of building a new structure for them. I'd actually extend that to just about any building. This isn't really happening at any scale on its own, which tells us it's less economical than other installations. Forcing higher cost installations while also entrenching parking lots that often shouldn't exist seems like poor policy, although I'm sure there are some places where it makes enough sense. But if we care about preserving farmland and wild spaces, stopping sprawl is the only real policy that matters, and that means stopping car dependency and parking lots.

this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
1042 points (100.0% liked)

196

16452 readers
1874 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS