this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
41 points (72.5% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8293 readers
156 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

That's like opting to do nothing and get force fed a bag of broken glass when the options were eat a plastic bag or eat a plastic bag full of glass.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nice to know genocide isn't the red line for some people.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You are completely (and very possibly intentionally) missing the point. Either way, I have no interest in continuing this conversation so byeeeeee!

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

When the options are less genocide and more genocide, you're ok with not standing against the more genocide candidate and letting them win.

Seems like genocide isn't as big of a red line as you say it is if you don't care to lessen it.