255

How Accidental Geoengineering May Be Affecting Climate Change. [Re: rise in sea temperature] (threadreaderapp.com)

submitted 1 year ago by trashhalo@beehaw.org to c/news@beehaw.org

46 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Scientists have discovered that the recent spike in global temperatures may be caused by a reduction in sulfur dioxide pollution from shipping vessels. Ships have long emitted sulfur dioxide, which cools the planet by seeding clouds and reflecting sunlight. However, new regulations that limit sulfur in ship fuels took effect in 2020, leading to a loss of this cooling effect equivalent to a large volcanic eruption each year. Models show this reduction in sulfur dioxide pollution can explain the extra warming seen in the North Atlantic. While pollution is bad, the new regulations provide a natural experiment that gives insight into how intentional geoengineering could potentially combat climate change in the future.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] MicTEST@ttrpg.network 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hank Green has a video about this and maybe we can safely replicate the sulfur dioxide's effects by shooting sea water into the air.

https://youtu.be/dk8pwE3IByg

[-] PCurd@feddit.uk 13 points 1 year ago

OPs link is Hank’s “blog post” about that video, he links to it in the article.

[-] parpol@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago

I wonder if there is a solution that involves a less dangerous gas instead of sea water. Spraying large volumes of water into the stratosphere is not really possible yet, so if it just rose as a gas it would be more doable.

[-] relevants@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

For a second I thought you were calling sea water a dangerous gas.

[-] FaceDeer@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

A while back there was a round of news suggesting calcium carbonate particulate stratospheric injection would be a good substitute for sulfur dioxide.

[-] inso@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure that spreading salt is a good idea when you consider that salt kills life when you spread it on land.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 19 points 1 year ago

I think the idea is to do it over oceans.

[-] FaceDeer@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

But then we'll get salt in the oceans and kill all the fish.

[-] Mutoid@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

We sprayed it outside the environment.

[-] strepto@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

We'll noclip out of the map and spray it out of bounds

[-] that_one_guy@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago

How certain could we be of where these clouds would fall once they were created?

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

A good question, I’m not an expert on this unfortunately. A quick google search did not reveal any answers.

this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023

255 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22057 readers

126 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.

Guidelines for submissions:

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

For US News, see the US News community.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS