219
submitted 3 months ago by communism@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 6 points 3 months ago

What makes sourcehut better?

From a self-hosting perspective, it looks like much more of a pain to get it set up and to keep it updated. There aren’t even official Docker images or builds. (There’s this and the forks of it, but it’s unofficial and explicitly says it’s not recommended for prod use.)

[-] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 3 months ago

It also supports browsing without JavaScript, if that's your thing.

[-] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Sourcehut has straightforward much better UI, UX, and features (more than gitea/forgejo but less than GitLab ig). I really dig the subdomain design.

Issues and PRs are conducted through email, essentially making that part federated and signup-less.

I’ve seen many pieces of software that claim to be beta/not used for prod but are actually bedrock solid.

this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
219 points (95.4% liked)

Open Source

31217 readers
95 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS