14
SpaceX Wins a First Battle in Its Assault on the NLRB (jacobin.com)
submitted 3 months ago by OneRedFox@beehaw.org to c/socialism@beehaw.org
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
  • Agencies employ ALJs, or "Administrative Law Judges", who specialize in regulations, and hear and oversee certain cases related to enforcement actions.
  • Some agencies have "removal protection" rules for employees like ALJs, that prevent e.g. the President from axing those employees (to prevent agencies having to get a new raft of judges every 4-8 years).
  • SCOTUS recently ruled those protections are unconstitutional, in SEC vs Jarkesy
  • SpaceX is arguing that because the NLRB has similar removal protection rules for its ALJs and some other members, it cannot bring enforcement actions against SpaceX
  • the district court agreed, and put an injunction on the NLRB from bringing a pending Unfair Labor Practice charge against SpaceX
[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

Excellent breakdown, thanks.

this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
14 points (100.0% liked)

Socialism

2845 readers
61 users here now

Beehaw's community for socialists, communists, anarchists, and non-authoritarian leftists (this means anti-capitalists) of all stripes. A place for all leftist and labor news and discussion, as long as you're nice about it.

Non-socialists are welcome to come to learn, though it's hard to get to in-depth discussions if the community is constantly fighting over the basics. We ask that non-socialists please be respectful and try not to turn this into a "left vs right" debate forum by asking leading questions or by trying to draw others into a fight.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
OneRedFox@beehaw.org