762
On a plate (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by lawrence@lemmy.world to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world

Author: Toby Morris

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com 15 points 3 months ago

Didn't Elon Musk spend $45 billion on Twitter after promising to end world hunger if someone gave him a plan to do so? I think that would be a few years' worth of ending global hunger if the estimate of $8-10 billion per year is even remotely still accurate.

There is more than enough money, food, and shelter in the world. But the rich are using the money they got by exploiting people to buy media companies, yachts, islands, and space rockets.

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

The problem with ending world hunger is, food abundance allows for more people. If you want to end world hunger, you need to start with healthcare and contraceptives and education, which is more expensive and less "flashy" than just saying "I bought a lifetime supply of rice for poor people in X area".

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

The problem with ending world hunger is, food abundance allows for more people.

That is a garbage take... as is all right-wing "overpopulation" bullshittery.

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's not, there is some nuance here.

The right-wing take is that we should use this potential crisis to lockdown borders, deny aid to others, and have it as an excuse why you don't have to do anything to fight climate change, becuase people in (pick whatever the current scary country is) are breeding out of control, and coming here and ruining things for us.

The left wing take is to promote healthcare, education, and contraceptive use, while providing aid, making those benefits available to everyone, and empowering yourself and others to act.

The facts about population dynamics is not a right or left wing thing. What you think is the solution to the situation is.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

It’s not, there is some nuance here.

Not really. The problem is fundamentally not one of population, but one of consumption. Specifically, the consumption of a small minority of rich people and the capitalist mode of production that keeps them rich. There may be no such thing as "overpopulation," but there is most definitely such a thing as overconsumption.

The last time I checked, it would take the resources of four earths if everyone on the planet consumed resources at the rate the average USian does, and keep in mind that this metric - average US consumption - is heavily skewed by the batshit insane consumption of the priveleged classes in the US.

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Ah yes, the US is the reason why other countries can't grow enough food.

Yes there is nuance here. It's idiotic to think that the interaction between population density, climate change, agricultural technology, supply line disruptions, international relationships and literally everything else, impacting the ability to provide food in a specific location on the planet is a black and white issue.

Shit, I should of realized it was you. The naive dogshit logic should have tipped me off.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago

Buy into right-wing fairy tales and apologetics all you want... it's only a matter of time before they come crashing down, just like the lies about your fetishized little white supremacist "heavenly kingdom" there in the middle-east came crashing down recently.

And there's not much you can do to stop it, apologist.

this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
762 points (97.2% liked)

Comic Strips

12509 readers
3281 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS