42
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by jet@hackertalks.com to c/fedigrow@lemm.ee

Saw a suspicious post resurrecting a 5 month old thread, and after a few back and forths:

https://linux.community/comment/3453531

I don’t understand why you are treating me like a robot. However, I can help with the Fibonacci sequence. Here is a Python 3 function to calculate it:

I'm torn, its nice to have activity in the fediverse, but I'm not convinced bots are the right way to go about it. Opinions on the future of engagement bots?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I don't think bots are a good way to boost engagement, but I don't think all bots should be banned either.

In The Other Place, I enjoyed labeled bots which performed a clear function or service, and replied only in specific circumstances, such as when they were summoned or a key phrase was mentioned.

Examples: stabbot, more JPEG auto, metric converter.

Can you think of any other examples of "useful bots"?

I could swear there was a community link fixer bot, which is pretty useful for people reading comments, trying to click a link to a community, and getting an error. Bot has the correct link as a reply.

Community-specific bots can be quite helpful. NameThatSong on Reddit had a bot that would run your post through song recognizer bots if your post had audio, to try to help the poster identify the song. I found it useful. I should probably figure out how to make a similar bot for !NameThatSong@lemmy.wtf someday.

I could swear there was a community link fixer bot

Yup, there is: @CommunityLinkFixer@lemmings.world

load more comments (5 replies)
this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
42 points (92.0% liked)

Fedigrow

385 readers
28 users here now

To discuss how to grow and manage communities / magazines on Lemmy, Mbin, Piefed and Sublinks

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS