737
submitted 3 months ago by mecfs@lemmy.world to c/facepalm@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 months ago

Similarly to how 'reactionary' just means 'bad' to these people. For the record a 'reactionary' is somebody who wants to restore a previous status quo. It's not inherently good or bad.

[-] frezik@midwest.social -3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Reactionary, in political science terms, is the opposite of radicals. Radicals are to the left and reactionaries are to the right. In practice, people on the internet tend to use radical for both, but I wish the distinction was made more clear.

[-] denshirenji@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

You are correct. Radicals want things to change in an extreme way, and reactionaries are just that, reactionary to change. Not sure why you got downvoted for knowing what you are talking about.

Language does change, though, and often laymen use words differently than subject matter experts.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 3 months ago

While I usually try not to be prescriptive with language, it has a place. The distinction between radical and reactionary is a useful one.

[-] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

No. Radical is simply somebody who wants to fundamentally change society. It's not the opposite of a reactionary, in fact, you can be radical and reactionary at the same time.

this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2024
737 points (91.1% liked)

Facepalm

2325 readers
262 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS