448
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 36 points 3 months ago

Dems absolutely need at least +5 % to eke out a win in the electoral college.

This sounds like dems celebrating too soon to me

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

We're celebrating that the trend is positive.

Look at it this way: when polls continued to decline under Biden the trajectory, the trend, portended a very bad outcome and signalled a change in strategy needed to occur.

When Democrats see these headlines, it means the battlefield is shifting in our favor or the wind is in our sails even if the war isn't yet won.

That's all. If a downward spiral of polls spells despair, an upward ascent of polls spells hype and enthusiasm, which tends to he contagious and self-sustaining like a nuclear reaction.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social -5 points 3 months ago

Actually I didn’t see that here at all.

When the polls were bad I mainly saw the blue no matter who crowd go on and on about how inaccurate the polls are

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Niche communities on a niche website like Lemmy are not representative of the wider democratic sample set to be fair. I was definitely one of those people sounding the alarm on here. For a considerable time many people felt Biden was our locked-in nominee and we had to support him no matter what because there was no alternative choice. And true, Vote Blue No Matter Who still applies whether polls go well or not.

But luckily, the wider Democratic party put enough pressure to have Biden stand down.

[-] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

The polls are inaccurate at times, that they don't necessarily show the exact amount of support a candidate has. A change in trends across multiple polls over time, however, can show changing attitudes, even if the specific percentage of support estimated is not necessarily accurate in each poll.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago

They are a toxic bane and should be named, shamed, and ignored.

[-] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

I'm holding all celebration until the election is certified and there is no sign of insurrection.

[-] batmaniam@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

no sign of insurrection

For what it's worth: I'm not a democrat. Ask me why I'm supporting a democrat and will say in no uncertain terms there is no choice to be made this election. I mean there's a lot of reasons, but it is utter insanity this isn't enough by a long shot.

[-] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

My dad was the same way after Jan6. Before he had been a hardcore drumpf supporter.

Seeing the attack on our capitol finally broke him out of it. I don't know if he's going to vote at all but I am sure that he won't be voting red for the first time in his life.

My aunt? Well.... not so much...

Thank you for being clear sighted about what has happened.

[-] batmaniam@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

That shit never would have flown with me. Again, I might be libertarian, but not the crazy kind.

But for whatever it's worth, this whole last decade has been weird. I know, personally, people who showed up with the goofy "tea party" hats that just kinda quietly bowed out, and on the other end people who became more vocal. It's just not normal. There's not a consistency between teaparty/not teaparty republicans and Trump.

I'm glad your Dad at least is in the former. I'll argue all day with those people about basic human rights, but my point is shit is fucked. The people I know, whether or not I agreed with them, that were on those statehouse steps, are not turning out to vote. I get fiscal conservatives, I get structuralists, I hope someday to meet one or the other, because certainly neither has ever been elected to office.

[-] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I know exactly one fiscal conservative and she thought the Tea Party was trouble long before either the media or I had figured out they were anything more than a goofy protest group.

That said, she was one person out of thousands. I used to live in a very red state and the vast majority of my fellow citizens there were the exactly stereotypical bigoted redneck that drumpf's bombastic style appeals to.

[-] batmaniam@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

There are legitimate concerns about our spending and debt. Fiscal conservatives aren't totally wrong when they bring that up, but it's never the sacred "free market" that has to take the blows. The last proper fiscal conservative was Eisenhower, and even that's a mixed bag.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

5% at a minimum.

8% to be a real favorite.

12% percent and it's locked up.

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Well technically you hypothetically could win an election with only 23% of the popular vote.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world -3 points 3 months ago

Yeah but we have actual data to support what I said

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

What is called for is more specific poll results. Like included in the data is that California went up 5% for Harris. Which doesn't matter in real terms, those electoral votes were never up for grabs.

In the states that are considered credibly not already settled, the polling results don't seem to have moved much, except maybe Pennsylvania is a hair more toward Harris than before, but it's still well within the margin of error it is so close.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Which is why 1% lead in polls is not very promising for kamala

And on top of that I’m assuming the polls have a margin of error at the very least of 2%

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It’s so fun and cool that the person with the most votes still loses but only if not Republican. Great system.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 3 points 3 months ago

Most votes usually means the big states and electoral college is more closely associated with representation in the House of Representatives….. so the electoral college is somewhat related to population but it’s off by a lot… there are also other factors, for example states with overall low populations (generally republican)

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 0 points 3 months ago

There’s a positive trend but I don’t think it’s as pronounced as some are celebrating it to be, or is it enough

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

There's momentum at the moment and things can change quickly. But there's just no doubt that Biden's decision to step back and Harris stepping up has sent Trump reeling.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 1 points 3 months ago

Agreed, as a progressive I’m actually getting excited for once in a long while

[-] Ilandar@aussie.zone 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The campaign certainly isn't celebrating too soon (Walz was a smart VP pick vs Vance who was clearly a celebratory lap pick). But yes, many people in the American left seem to think Harris is going to shit all over Trump despite her only just pulling even during her honeymoon period.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 1 points 3 months ago

I live in a blue state and I was planning on leaving president option blank on my ballot for Biden or harris.

Now seriously considering filling in that bubble to Harris / walz and encouraging family and friends to do the same…. But again I live in a state that is going to be blue

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Agreed. It's not over until it's over. If people haven't learned that by now, then clearly they weren't paying close enough attention in 2016. Get off your asses, vote, put in the work, and if you win then you can celebrate.

this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
448 points (97.1% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2600 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS