702
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] XEAL@lemm.ee 41 points 5 months ago

Wrong, they should CEASE to exist

[-] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 31 points 5 months ago

Well, I don't know about your but I'd prefer a system where it wouldn't be possible for a single person to amass that many resources in the first place

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

Worker co-ops, social safety nets, guaranteed income and a robust, free universal healthcare option are all things we could do RIGHT NOW without hurting our precious capitalist empire at all. In the long run some businesses like the Healthcare companies will suffer and have to downsize, but it's always been absolutely astonishing to me that a company like Tesla, IBM, Boeing, Walmart or other mega-companies close plants or stores and send tens of thousands of people into joblessness and poverty nobody bats an eye.

The moment we talk about actions that might impact the insurance empires suddenly we have to all worry about the workers and all the businesses that are connected to the insurance company and so on.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] AIhasUse@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

What's the most amount of resources that it should be legal to acquire?

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The answer is either "None of it" or "No more than you need", depending on how based you are.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago

Accumulation should be removed, there should be no individual Capital Owners trying to collect more and more and more.

[-] AIhasUse@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Can you clarify a bit more? I have enough money where I could stop working for the next 8 or 9 months if I chose. Should I be allowed to keep this?

What about my neighbor, his house is 3x the size of my wife's and mine, and he lives alone. He could sell one of his three cars and survive for a year if he had to. I'm sure he has a savings that could last him 5 years or more. How much should he be allowed to keep? Or should he just be forced to take a vacation until he gets closer to average?

Or should the cap be more around one lifetimes worth of savings?

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 months ago

We are within Capitalism, so without replacing it with a better system, we cannot remove accumulation.

I am not advocating for putting a cap on accumulation in Capitalism, I am advocating for replacing the entire Capitalist system with one where accumulation is not only impossible, but unnecessary and unwanted.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] XEAL@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

Too late for that, that's the problem.

[-] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 months ago

Yeah absolutely true. Frankly I don't think we'll be able to unfuck ourselves before it's much too late from a climate viewpoint – and I'm not entirely convinced we haven't already passed the point of no return

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Grayox@lemmy.ml 36 points 5 months ago

They should exsist, as a footnote in human history.

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Nah there should be a whole chapter about oligarchs that make future people go "what the fuck". Hopefully followed by the one about how we no longer have oligarchs that makes future people go "based".

[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 26 points 5 months ago

%100. No one needs that much money to live comfortably. It is a mental disorder.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 26 points 5 months ago

Why would I want to change your mind‽

[-] xenoclast@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

No. Will not change your mind

[-] thorbot@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Stop using this fucking format

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

They only exist because we allow it.

[-] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago

Why the fuck is Gritty a member of Crowder's mug club? Fucking cancelled.

(If you're not going to fully Photoshop that fascist out of the meme, use the Calvin & Hobbes version)

[-] Peter1986C 7 points 5 months ago

This one, right?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Thought this guy looked familiar, turns out I was thinking of the Honey Monster from UK ads in the 90s.

[-] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago

Has gritty acknowledged this relation???

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
702 points (94.8% liked)

Political Memes

5453 readers
2737 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS