22
submitted 4 months ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.zip

Madrid unveils a digital wallet to help porn platforms verify users’ ages.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ptz@dubvee.org 28 points 4 months ago

And the digital wallet service provider is breached in 3...2...1....

[-] itsralC@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago

Not so long ago the traffic authority's database was breached. Government ID numbers linked to names and surnames for all to see.

[-] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago

No.

Mandate that OS vendors for computing devices (desktops, mobile phones, consoles, etc.) must provide parental controls and instructions on how to set them up.

Then legislate in 2 years time, any parents found that they have not implemented the parental controls are liable for parental negligence charges.

It's on the parents to regulate what their kids watch and it's on the tech companies to provide them with the tools.

There you are, I've fixed the "what about the innocent children's minds?" issue without causing a privacy problem.

You're welcome.

[-] RedStrawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Edit: spelling & TLDR; Sorry for the lil'rant, don't intend this as an attack or to be so long, thoughts just flowed :/ don't read if ya don't wanna

Mandated parental controlls options would be pretty amazing, and relatively easy to implement. Honestly i'd love it. But requiring parents to use them? How do you prove that without another privacy nightmare? Parental control's effectiveness depends a lot usage, a few slips an it's for naught. Plus how would the regulators know what devices the children use? Or if they use/have them at all? Or if parents pay attention to parental controls - if its not just a cardboard vault?

I think the problem is legislators know this and 'terroists' are probably the easiest kinda legitimate attack they have on online privacy. That or they're so tech ignorant they're automatically applying how they'd usually restrict stuff like alcohol/drugs, so regulate the seller/vendor/whatever — not thinking of any more nuanced approacea.

Ultimately its probably best left as a 'educate people, hope for the best' thing. Added to some help from - like you said - mandating parental control implimentation, tightened child neglect/abuse regulation or damn education/schools needs a ton of work too. Maybe make website blocking easier for less tech literate on home networks too. Parent's responsibility but make forfilling that responsibility as easy as possible.

I imagine it might be possible for a parent in the UK to be sued for that already. If that parent breached their duty of care by psycological harm to they child? Maybe you could claim for negligence? I doubt anyone's tried, tbh it's a bit of a stretch and I don't know the law that well ...plus it'd be a right expensive, long process not to mention only a civil case so no criminal consiquences. Unless it's some rich guy's Fuck you case or it's an extreme case borderlining child abuse, not likely.

Sorry again for the wall of text😅thanks

[-] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 4 points 4 months ago

So porn hub will pull out?

I don't though

[-] itsralC@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

For now they're only forcing it on websites hosted in spain (they exist???). They say they have plans to talk with ireland, which would include most of Big Tech, but I'm hopeful that this is just virtue signalling, which would be par for the course.

this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
22 points (92.3% liked)

Technology

1381 readers
282 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS