this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

World News

36783 readers
656 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Evono@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I really hope they dont plan to blow it... this + fukushima putting radioactive water back to the sea can be ridiculously bad.

[–] sovietsnake@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The US will probably do it, let's hope they don't.

[–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago

The same class of people responsible for Fukushima (skimping on costs to maximise profits) would be more than happy to blow a nuclear reactor.

[–] lenux12343@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

This is interesting, is it because they are loosing territory or planning to blow it?

[–] ciko22i3@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Russia is reducing its presence at the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, Ukraine’s military intelligence directorate (GUR) has claimed, with staff told to relocate to Crimea and military patrols scaled back.

The agency’s chief, Kyrylo Budanov, has alleged Moscow has approved a plan to blow up the station and has mined four out of six power units, as well as a cooling pond. Last week Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, said Russia was plotting a “terrorist attack”.

According to the GUR, several representatives of Russia’s state nuclear energy agency, Rosatom, have already left. Ukrainian employees who stayed at the plant and signed contracts with Rosatom had been told to evacuate by Monday, preferably to Crimea, it said.

I guess they could blow it up soon. Horrifying.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Muntjac@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Grossi asserted that he "didn't see that kind of development" on the ground, but also that "anything can happen, that is what worries me".

IAEA is not confirming it, but I think it's a stretch to get "pure deranged nonsense" from that quote.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml -3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Thinking that Russia would blow up a nuclear power plant that Russia controls is deranged nonsense.

[–] Muntjac@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

...in your opinion. As per your link, the IAEA does not share your certainty.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In the opinion of any sane person, and what IAEA says is that there is no substance to the conspiracy theory being peddled here.

[–] Muntjac@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It is fascinating how personal biases shape our communications and beliefs.

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@lemmy.ml -5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They blew up a dam they controlled. why not a nuclear power plant?

[–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@lemmy.ml -5 points 2 years ago

No but they didn't claim the mass graves in bucha either so i am reluctant to trust their silence

[–] zosu@vlemmy.net -1 points 2 years ago

probably a bit of both :/

@lenux12343 I'd presume that #Putin will likely pull out of #Ukraine entirely if he doesn't win soon (within the next two-three weeks), looking at the support #Prigozhin was able to get among the citizens of #Russia

load more comments
view more: next ›