this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8270 readers
535 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AbidingOhmsLaw@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Pay wall, can’t read the article :(

[–] assembly@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Blatant politics from the Supreme Court. The states had no standing to appear before the court on a federal issue. Kagan dissent was the ruling that should have been.

[–] Broncos_Fan@lemmy.one -1 points 2 years ago

What a fucking joke.

[–] CrazyDuck@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

I do not get how these 6 states were determined to have standing in the first place? Isn't the whole US justice system predicated on the fact that you need to experience direct or indirect harm, be an actually involved party for you to be able to sue? They're federal loans, so federal money, where does their standing come from?

[–] thoro@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)