12
submitted 1 year ago by Sibbo@sopuli.xyz to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] webghost0101@lemmy.fmhy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Being poor and idolizing the rich.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That’s by design

[-] plumbus@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago

Being proud of not knowing things, and having no desire to change that.

[-] dudeami0@lemmy.dudeami.win 2 points 1 year ago

Being proudly ignorant of everything is bad. I will respect people who know they don't know things though, you can't know everything about everything. It's why people generally specialize in a field in an industry.

[-] Sunrosa@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Sometimes my friends laugh at me for how little I know about pop culture. I laugh back though. I wouldn't say I'm proud of it but it's just funny.

[-] DePingus@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Thinking that someone without a formal education is somehow beneath you.

[-] ram@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

On the flipside, the belief that someone with a formal education is somehow beneath you or brainwashed for it.

[-] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Bigotry and prejudice. Not necessarily uneducated, but certainly poorly educated.

[-] mcc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Some people can be very well educated but choose not to follow reason. For example polititions appealing to a voting base. Point is these things certainly say "what a twat" but doesn't necessarily reflect poor education.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SeverianWolf@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

People who litter. Throw their rubbish out the window of the car. Or who throw rubbish in public, like into drains or sidewalks.

It’s in the mentality, and I say the lack of education is the reason for it.

It’s sad to see the people of my country do this, and to see it with your own eyes.

[-] StankFlipper@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

"Let's go Brandon!" Bumper stickers.

[-] atlasraven31@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Not being able to entertain ideas. "What would the world be like with 100% renewable energy?" "Would basic healthcare for every person help our country?"

I tried to explain the 4 day work week to someone that gets paid by the hour. You make the same money but work 4 days a week instead of 5. Insisted he got paid less. Had to explain like a Bingo card with a Free Space, 1 day he is paid even if he stays home.

[-] utopianfiat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I don't know if that's necessarily wrong of them. There isn't any precedent for hourly workers to be paid when they're not working. The "four day workweek" as described simply means that any time over 32 hours a week is overtime. Hourly workers in general don't really have a "workweek" anyway because they will often have multiple jobs or will work whatever shift they can pick up that works with their schedule.

They understood how the 4-day workweek works based on how the 5-day workweek works. I think maybe you need to listen more to them and try to understand your own proposition better.

When companies voluntarily implement 4-day workweeks, they are literally either cutting 8 hours or doing 10-hour shifts. They do not pay for hours not worked.

[-] MrVilliam@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I like the idea of the 4 day workweek and would absolutely advocate for it, but I'm not sure how I personally would be affected by it. I do rotating 12 hour shift work to operate a power plant. I flip between 36 and 48 scheduled hours, 5 to 5 flipping between days and nights with a few days off between to flip my sleep schedule.

Would my OT start after 32 hours instead of 40? Would my company hire more people to schedule me between 24 and 36 hour weeks as a result? Because I'm not sure they'd be down with paying 4 hours OT on the cheapest weeks of my labor, and 16 hours OT every other week. So they probably have me work less, but does this result in a one time 25% raise and then fall off over time as no further raises come?

Idk, I would be fine either way because of how I budget, but I think these are valid questions that most hourly workers should be concerned about. I don't think it's such a simple concept, and companies will almost certainly find loopholes to exploit to fuck us like they did for the ACA.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Because he's an hourly worker he's in the hourly mindset. You'd have to say your hourly rate would go up but only if you worked 32 hr/wk.

[-] LimitedBrain@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I think it's good to note that while some of this is a failure to develop critical thinking, failure to entertain hypotheticals is OFTEN a trait for people with differing cognition. So don't assume they're poorly educated just from this, take it as a sign that the person thinks differently.

I've met and am friends with people who struggle with hypotheticals and education isn't the problem, just how their brain works.

[-] voxov7@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Also, some hypotheticals don't consider the inherent problem of a situation or ignores context, and therefor aren't worth entertaining. Not all, just some. When that happens it's best to explain why the hypothetical doesn't work, which I suppose is entertaining it.

[-] squirrel_bear@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Being poor or lower middle class and voting for right wing/conservatives. You essentially give away your hard earned money and give it to ultra rich and worsen the quality of your life.. usually because the right wing scares people to be afraid of other people and new phenomena.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

religion and the belief in the supernatural/paranormal. also the belief in conspiracy theories.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] utopia_dig@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not trusting in science.

Edit: Since there are many comments, I would like to clarify my statement. I meant that you should rather trust scientists, that the earth is round / that there is a human-made climate change, etc. and not listen to some random internet guy, that claims these things are false although he has made no scientific tests or he has no scientific background. I know that there are paradigm shifts in science and sometimes old ideas are proven to be wrong. But those shifts happen through other scientific experiments/thoughts. As long as > 99 % of all scientists think that something is true, you should rather trust them then any conspiracy theorist...

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Joe_0237@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

People who think their dialect or language style is grammatically correct and others are wrong, because they don't personally known the grammar rules of any other dialect or language. They don't understand that language is alive and evolving and that the purpose of language is communication.

[-] CorrodedCranium@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Parents feeding their baby cola in bottles and smoking while pregnant are two things that usually cause me to make assumptions

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

MAGA Hats. Those people are dumb by choice. And that's less forgivable than people who just don't know any better.

[-] Fleppensteijn@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

Associating with arbitrary groups, such as football fans, nationalists, wearing certain clothing brands

[-] sambal@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Not wanting to tax the rich because "I might be rich one day".

[-] lemuria@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

This also screams "I am a selfish and self-centered person".

[-] MrNemobody@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Listening to loud music without giving a shit about the neighbours.

[-] Leperhero@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Not learning from history.

[-] pH3ra@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

"Whataboutism", or if you are unfamiliar with the term:

"The act or practice of responding to an accusation of wrongdoing by claiming that an offense committed by another is similar or worse"

People that use this mechanism are "poorly educated" and unable to hold a conversation and they should just be mocked by whatabouting even harder, so they can maybe understand that they're dumb and that's not how you should debate.

Example of the last argument I had recently with my dumb c*nt father:

  • Me: You shouldn't idolize that politician, he evaded literally billions in taxes and that befalls on citizens like you
  • Dumb c*nt father: Yeah? And what about that other politician?
  • Me: What about the disappearing middle class?!
  • D.C.F.: What...?
  • Me: WHAT ABOUT THE BEES!?!
[-] const_void@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Reckless driving, speeding, having a loud car, having a lifted pickup truck.

[-] Antik@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Being a republican. Sure there are some educated grifters who decide to label themselves as republican, but your average republican voter is a mouth-breathing fucking idiot.

[-] salarua@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

taking Ayn Rand's work seriously. five seconds of critical thought and her entire philosophy comes crashing down

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] KeefChief12@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] fluffy_birb_01@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Using terms like 'u', 'ur', etc when writing. No one charges by the letter, it's simply lazy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

People who are proud about their lack of knowledge on a topic as if that somehow means that they were not programmed prior to the encounter.

[-] Anti_Weeb_Penguin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Being a conservative and accusing every progressive person of being a pedophile.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
12 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43855 readers
1658 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS