402
submitted 3 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] NABDad@lemmy.world 126 points 3 months ago
[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 32 points 3 months ago

I believed the 46. She looked great for 55. A wonderful person from the testimonies. Fuck cancer.

[-] roguetrick@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That makes more sense. I was in elementary school when season 1 came out and she would've gotten the VA job for production right at like age 18/19 with no resume for such a major project.

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 106 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This is not a political statement. If you are a woman and are unable, or choose not, to have children, please have yourself more regularly screened for breast, uterine, and ovarian cancers.

Women who do not have children are at a higher risk for these types of cancers as well as other disorders. Doctors don't always recommend increased screening for childless women despite the increased risk.

And, in general, women should regularly do self exams of their breasts for lumps or changes in the breast tissue, ideally as a part of your shower/bath routine.

https://www.nationalbreastcancer.org/breast-self-exam/#:~:text=1)%20In%20the%20Shower,or%20any%20other%20breast%20changes.

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 41 points 3 months ago
[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 33 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's even more pronounced in smaller mammals like rabbits. If you don't spay your rabbit and don't let it breed within the first 3 years it will have ~80% chance of developing Uterine cancer and dying 12-18 months later. Usually dying beween 3 and 5 years old. A spayed rabbit, or one that's breeding will live to 8 if all goes well.

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

What is the biological cause of this increased risk?

[-] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/hormones/reproductive-history-fact-sheet

https://uamshealth.com/medical-myths/is-a-woman-who-has-never-given-birth-more-likely-to-develop-ovarian-or-uterine-cancer-than-a-woman-who-has-had-a-child/

It appears to be breast, ovarian and uterine cancers.

It appears to be exposure to the bodies sex hormones, primarily during reproductive years.

Taking certain types of hormonal birth control seems to have a similar protective effect, while others have an increased risk (At least in the case of ovarian cancers).

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

I knew there were increased risks for some women from longitudinal exposure to birth control, but I never knew it could have a protective affect in others. Biology is wild man. Our bodies and the things we put into them are constantly in a battle somewhere between saving us, and killing us at all times. It's both fascinating and also a bit terrifying really, at least to me.

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 months ago

Tldr, get out there and fuck everything that moves.

[-] ilovededyoupiggy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago
[-] bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net 6 points 3 months ago

He's trying to save that rabbit

[-] John_McMurray@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 3 months ago

Using birth control. Everything stays in an adolescent state. Getting pregnant once and aborting avoids this, but they keep that quiet.

[-] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago

It's sad that you have to start a good advice with such disclaimer. How did we let thus happen...

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 50 points 3 months ago

Diagnosed in May with breast cancer, this was fast.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

If you don't catch it early on, you're not going to see the symptoms until its far too late. Hence the need for early and regular screenings.

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 43 points 3 months ago

So young too. Such a shame. Fuck Cancer.

[-] ObamaBinLaden@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago

I might be mistaken but I think she also voiced Jigglypuff, Vulpix, and Goldeen

[-] RagnarokOnline@programming.dev 12 points 3 months ago

I like to think you know this because you recognized her voice in those pokeys

[-] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago

That would be cute but you would be freak of nature if you can identify voice actors behind Pokemon's.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Fuck👏
cancer!👏

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 11 points 3 months ago

I hope she was able to get the end of life care her family was fundraising for.

Her voice was a big party of my childhood in the 90s and 00s.

46 is way too young to go so fast. Excruciating for her friends and family, I can't imagine.

[-] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

So sad to see another person become a statistic in the fight against cancer. My heart goes out to her and her family.

I hate to make something like this political but Republicans in the senate just rejected a bipartisan bill that would have increased funding for finding a cure for cancer.

this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
402 points (98.3% liked)

News

23367 readers
3135 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS