215

Secret Russian Counter-Drone EW System Recovered by Ukraine in Kursk Region (www.kyivpost.com)

submitted 2 months ago by alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to c/world@lemmy.world

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 25 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] BlucifersVeinyAnus@sh.itjust.works 60 points 2 months ago

This system is considered one of the most advanced and secretive in Russia's defense arsenal. It works by emitting radio frequency (RF) interference disrupting the control signals between the drone and its operator, forcing it to either land or hover in place until it is brought down, or its battery fails.

Am I reading this wrong, or, are they in fact saying that Russia’s most advanced defensive technology is an rf jammer?

[-] Ordo_Bellatores@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago

Well compared to wood blocks and chicken wire cages, a simple RF hammer does seem pretty high tech ...

[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

Given the massive distance these drones fly, I think an RF jammer is the best they could come up with.

And it doesn't appear to be very effective judging by the footage of drone attacks.

[-] Ansis100@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Isn't an RF jammer basically the only defense against a drone? Apart from shooting it down?

[-] BlucifersVeinyAnus@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 months ago

Laser bearing attack eagles are pretty standard in most modern warfare.

[-] Avg@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

I didn't think about that but I'm certain I've seen a video of an eagle trained to hunt drones.

[-] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Lol so they stuck a rf target on their tanks...

[-] Skua@kbin.earth 41 points 2 months ago

Ukrainian military analyst Oleksandr Kovalenko commented that he believes the Volnorez system’s capability to be overstated, describing it as practically useless. He argues that it has been deployed on the battlefield for a year without significantly impacting on the success of the Armed Forces of Ukraine’s (AFU) kamikaze drone attacks.

I know nothing about this guy's credentials, but this was my first thought. I have seen so many tanks getting destroyed by drones. Are these systems not getting deployed or do they not work?

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 22 points 2 months ago

Probably a bit of both. I'm sure Russia has been overstating how many operational systems they have. "Appear strong when you are weak", and all that. But claims and appearances only go so far.

[-] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

It would not surprise me if this is mostly a placebo to calm the nerves of the tank crew.

[-] greenskye@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

One tank has the real one. The rest are spray painted kitchenware

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

Shhh! That’s the secret!!

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 1 points 2 months ago

Presumably they don't post the ones where it works and the drone crashes

I suspect it is useless just because of the pace of technological development on the Ukraine side vs. the Russian side, but just the existence of some videos where the EW isn't working doesn't mean it's not working.

[-] lemming741@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Give the drone a few directional antennas and have it aim for the jammers

[-] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

Jammers are great, what HARM could they possibly cause

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago

Cancer. All ruzzians driving these tanks are going to be getting cancer.

[-] MartianSands@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

HARM is a category of weapon which seeks things like radar or jammers. They weren't suggesting that the jammers are literally harmless.

In unrelated news: the jammers are, in fact, harmless unless you're making a habit of riding on top of the tank. The radio energy isn't going to penetrate a significant thickness of conductive material, such as armour plating. Or unless you're the person being jammed, in which case they're a different category of harmful

[-] 0laura@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

why would this cause cancer? isn't it non ionizing radiation?

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago

Ionization is not the only way RF can affect the body. You can generate plasma at low RF energy that is not ionizing. Yet the plasma is bad for you. So if you can generate plasma in vacuum with non ionizing RF, imagine what it can do to anything it can couple to.

[-] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 months ago

I was expecting this counter-drone system was destroyed by Ukrainian drones... but this is even better.

[-] realitista@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

Wouldn't you not want to tell them you have one so that they keep wasting energy and manpower thinking it works?

[-] Maalus@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Or you tell them you have it and they immediately stop using it, even before you crack how it works.

[-] realitista@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Sounds like it doesn't really work though.

[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Look at that, a fantastic find! Even if Sudzha is retaken, the knowledge of Russian anti-drone tech is now revealed. And it's so stupid. Like, is Russia undergoing an active internal rebellion to help make things worse? Because it's hard to imagine any effort being so constantly countered - and so effectively!

this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024

215 points (98.6% liked)

World News

39004 readers

2622 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.