peopleproblems

joined 2 years ago
[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Has anyone tried asking the fancy chatbot?

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

I'm so confused

I didn't grow up in the 60s or watching the show so maybe I just don't remember seeing her twitch her nose ever. I always thought it was some sort of a quick smirk she did when using her power.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Sat on it for too long?

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Wow, this is the first I'm hearing of an explosion in an explosives plant where 16 people died on Thursday.

What the absolute fuck, how horrifying

Not only that, but the building was leveled. Nothing but scrap metal left.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

I love how just how shitty the posts get here.

Why? Because fuck you, that's why.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think you fell for the trick they're trying to sell that the LLMs are capable of "reasoning."

They are not. They are gigantic matricies of numbers that are applied to text after the text has been assigned numbers.

For example, if we stick a fork in an outlet, we will not do it again. If you don't believe me, try it yourself.

An LLM has no means of testing whether or not it is a bad idea.

Additionally, an LLM doesn't have the capability to observe others who test an action.

If LLMs could test their outputs to find the real consequences of their statements, then we would be talking about actual intelligence. For now, they're just number maps.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Sat on it for too long

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

Gestures broadly to all recorded history.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

The founders debated long after the constitution was ratified too.

Outlawing parties would be in direct violation of their first amendment. Humans are social by nature* - coalitions, parties, groups will form just because we exist.

*Yes I'm counting my AuADHD ass because even though I hate socializing with a passion I want to be able to.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago

It's almost like we have this whole written history to learn from and the people unable or uninterested in learning keep doing the same shit because they didn't know it was tried before.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 42 points 3 days ago (14 children)

It's like their thing.

It's actually kind of mind boggling. Lenin knew this was a thing and took all sorts of steps to correct it, but his mistake was demanding it to improve by force. "We're making your lives better now, or else."

I mean, shit, a big ass group of armed dudes on horses show up in my cold ass disconnected village and they say we need to do x, y, and z to improve our lives or else? Yeah that's sus.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'm worried these means of carving up the government are going to get the Democrats to capitulate. They will blame Democrats for everything that gets carved anyway, that was always the plan.

The regime needed to be starved of funds earlier this year. Second best time is now. If the supreme court allows the executive to allocate tarrifs as they want, then the branch still gets some means of funding - probably military and ICE.

There is a flaw with their plan. Yes, we will all suffer greatly, but ever increasing tarrifs on imported goods will result in a decrease on imported goods regardless if they are made in America or not. This means that while they might have a good source of funds secured temporarily, the revenue generated is still bound by math. n * ( price of good * tarrif - price of good) = total revenue. As n approaches 0, revenue approaches 0, regardless if tarrifs grow infinitely.

At some point, even the wealthiest Americans won't be able to afford the imported good. If nothing is imported, no money is generated, and the executive has nothing to allocate.

They're definitely aware of this. Hence why they are doing everything they can do to guarantee a 2026 midterm gives them complete control of the house and Senate. They need regular funds back before they can no longer pay ICE and military. That's coming here very soon.

 
 
 
 

I didn't care for the musical nature of it. That aside:

The first 'Joker' clearly established that the main character was Arthur Fleck. Clearly suffering from mental illness as a result of abuse growing up, and the people he murdered were abusing him in some way. To me, as a long time Batman fan, this 'Joker' was anything but Joker.

  1. He didn't take pleasure in chaos.
  2. He wasn't anti-batman in anyway.
  3. A clear back story that lined up with his behaviors.
  4. Clearly a dude pushed too far (kind of like Killing Joke, but it didn't line up with that character's style).

However, when he was in the 'Joker' role, he became clear headed and focused. So now the 'Joker' clearly isn't Joker but the beginning of Joker?

In Folie A Deux, we see him continue to be abused, still having strange fantasies, a system failing around him, and noticably the 'Joker' character is resonating with people fed up with all sorts of bullshit. The collective desire to burn it down and restart - very common theme within the Batman comics and joker. We see Harley Quinzel introduced, and as we discover throughout the movie - this is the actual Harley Quinn Psychiatry, brilliance, obsessed with Joker to the point that when Arthur says it was just something he made up to do what he thought he needed, she quit him. The last parts of the movie tie is completely together. Ricky, who is killed by the only guard that is sometimes nice, breaks Arthur, realizing murder happens to those undeserving by those who 'shouldnt' be doing it.

Joker escapes after the court room explosion (with a burned Harvey Dent, that was badass). He's rescued by enthusiasts, who he escapes from. He encounters Quinn and she says that his "fantasy was all that mattered, and it's gone."

When the Joker is murdered at the end by the psychopath, he starts it with a retelling of the joke Arthur told Murray. Albeit, one that was significantly better delivered. He also notably uses a knife, and is laughing the whole time, and gives himself a scarred smile. This man, (if Warner Bros could ever finish a good DC series) would likely continue to be an evolution of 'Joker'.

This all works because:

  1. Joker rarely has a back story, and famously is stated to prefer his origin to be "Multiple Choice."
  2. Several comics and media (Notably the Arkham series of video games) explore how Joker is not confined to a single person. Unlike Batman who has very specic goals, values, and traumatic origin, Joker is a shared 'idea' between these individuals that reject the value of civilization at all.
  3. Harley Quinzel was only introduced in the 90s, but her main obsession with Joker evolved over time as he abused her, or burned things she learned to care for, but seemingly remained obsessed because of some 'fantasy' she provided him, UNTIL he broke that fantasy and she quit him abruptly just like in the movie.

I don't think it was a great movie. But it actually reimagined the same Joker story in a new way that I did thoroughly enjoy. And it left it plenty open for more stories from it, just as all good DC stories do.

 

This is what I do for work I guess

 
 

It will still break them if you try it

 
 

I'm talking like one person brought in all the money for a decade, then a divorce happens. Some of it makes sense - a house with mortgage, one spouse buys the other out of the house. Which is great, but if one spouse doesn't have the income to take a loan out to buy the other, does that mean that the spouse who does have the income has the choice to buy out or sell?

Similarly, things like 401ks and pensions I imagine you can't just take out half the cash in them and give that to their spouse. Or does that have to be a loan for the amounts in those plans?

Is it debt all the way down for both?

 
 

Let me set the stage: Newly single dad of a young kid. After COVID-19 I haven't done much outside of my home and taking care of my kid. I work full time-remote, and between the kiddo and leaving room for a hobby or taking care of the house, it seems like the only other thing I have time for is sleep.

The thing I know is that this is likely an issue with my anxiety and anxious attachment. The conclusion we've arrived at in therapy is that I gotta meet people. I apparently forgot, or don't know how to do that. Where to meet people. It's not a big city, but 200k-300k people in the county.

Maybe I'm looking for something of a strategy more than anything.

edit: thank you guys, I really appreciate it!

 
view more: next ›