I didn't see what the family was compensated for the bracelet in the article. Would seem odd to me if there is zero compensation.
My understanding is that it was declared "treasure", it was assured and handed back to him. The museum expressed an interest and a fund paid for it to be acquired. They are not announcing the amount either because of his agenor because the family want privacy.
They have a whole process for this in the UK. Typically the finder gets a reward.
Haha, 3 months in nick. "What are you in for?" "Ah, found an old bit of tin in a field and the local coroner found out. You?"
What ever happened to the universal rule of finders keepers?!
The British only apply that logic when they're pillaging lands that aren't their own, apparently
It's all HMTreasure
"While walking dog in UK" sounds like he'd gone to the UK to walk his dog.
- "Drop it! Dropitt!!"
- [barks a legions tune in latin]
British Archaeology
For archaeological finds in Britain or by Brits.
See also:
Elsewhere in the Fediverse: