Brother. Period. The most expensive model you can afford which fits your list.

Why? The more expensive models have bigger toners, which for home use sometimes mean "never have replaced the toner in 10 years" and better internal mechanics which means the thing will never break down and you only replace it because the outer plastic has become yellow and you want something different to look at after 20 years. Or so it went with my previous brother laser) the freaking thing had an usb1 and paralel port and it just wouldn't give up.

Why I don't have a product number? Because mine does have a scanner integrated. I've the DCP-L8410CDW which I can wholeheartedly recommend. But you don't need the scanner.

Printers? Always buy a brother, always the most expensive you can afford. You'll thank me in 10 years.

I like Brother lasers. And I’d stay away from HP

I have a Brother HL-L8360CDW and it checks several of your boxes. I've had it for a few years and it works great for office-type printing. I've never seriously tried printing photos on it, so I can't speak to that, but I'm currently using it in a mixed Windows/Linux/Android environment over wifi. Even if that's not the model for you, I think Brother is the right brand.

Seconding Brother.

Alternatively, I have a canon pixma (can'tremember the model. 45something.) It's not great, but it's reliable and it was dirt cheap. I've had it for years with no issues. Plus my cat likes to sleep on top of it, which I guess is a positive thing. It does have a scanner, though.

I’ve had decent results with my Brother MFC-L3750CDW. This one has a scanner because my use case is a bit different, but it definitely ticks the color laser, wifi, and Windows/Linux boxes. I wouldn’t necessarily use it to print photos, not because they’re bad, but because the colors tend to show up dark.

My current soft choice is the Brother HL-L3210CW. Ticks the boxes, and has good reviews (for what that's worth).