339
submitted 2 months ago by nave@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AlphaOmega@lemmy.world 212 points 2 months ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 148 points 2 months ago

Considering that RAM is shared with the GPU, it's still not enough.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 150 points 2 months ago

It's OK - for an extra $400 they'll sell you one with an extra $50 worth of RAM.

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 45 points 2 months ago

It doesn't even cost that for them.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] scottmeme@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 months ago

$800 for $30 of ram

[-] PoopMonster@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago

"yeah but that's like having 32GB on a lame PC"

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Pantsofmagic@lemmy.world 87 points 2 months ago

It's really sad that this needs to be an actual headline.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] forgotaboutlaye@lemmy.world 76 points 2 months ago

I know it's not a like for like comparison, but the Pixel 9 Pro that launched this month has 16gb of RAM.

[-] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 31 points 2 months ago

Yup, while the current iPhone 15 Pro is the only model which has 8 GB of RAM, with the regular iPhone 15 having 6 GB. All iPhone 16 models (launching next month) will still only have 8 GB according to rumors, which happens to be the bare minimum required to run Apple Intelligence.

Giving the new models only 8 GB seems a bit shortsighted and will likely mean that more complex AI models in future iOS versions won't run on these devices. It could also mean that these devices won't be able to keep a lot of apps ready in the background if running an AI model in-between.

16 GB is proper future-proofing on Google's part (unless they lock new software features behind newer models anyway down the road), and Apple will likely only gradually increase memory on their devices.

[-] filister@lemmy.world 41 points 2 months ago

Pretty much what NVIDIA is doing with their GPUs. Refusing to provide adequate future proof amount of VRAM on their cards. That's planned obsolescence in action.

[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

And like Apple, Nvidia has no shortage of fanboys that insist the pitiful amounts of (V)RAM is enough. The marketing sway those two companies have is incredible.

It's a complete joke that Sapphire had an 8GB version of the R9 290X, what, 11 years ago or something? And yet Nvidia is still selling 8GB cards now, for exorbitant prices, and people lap it up.

[-] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

The current GPU situation actually has me curious about AMDs upcoming Halo APU chips. They're likely going to be pretty expensive relative to their potential GPU equivelent performance but if they work out similar to the combined price of a CPU and GPU then it might be worthwhile as they use onboard RAM as their VRAM. Probably a crazy idea but one I look forward to theory-building in spring when they release.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tankplanker@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

If you were being cynical, you could say it was planned obsolescence and that when the new ai feature set rolls out that you have to get the new phone for them.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] echodot@feddit.uk 15 points 2 months ago

It's a good comparison actually because Apple keeps saying that their ram is faster because it's soldered (Which is true but only if you squint). I don't really think it makes a difference because if you run out of space you still run out of space, the fact that you can access the limited space more quickly doesn't really help.

Well phone RAM also tends to be solded onto the board too so it's a pretty good comparison.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bruhduh@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Some phones have 24gb since 2 years ago already

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 76 points 2 months ago

for the same price other laptops sell for 64GB

what a bargain

[-] mechoman444@lemmy.world 51 points 2 months ago

Oooo a whole 16 gigs! It can run Firefox with more than four tabs open!

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 41 points 2 months ago

...is this actually 16Gb or 8Gb feeling like 16Gb, as per previous statements?

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I think perhaps they realize the Apple magic has worn off and people have shockingly realized that 8 GB is in fact 8 GB.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] daddy32@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago

...in 2030.

[-] Omgboom@lemmy.zip 35 points 2 months ago

Linux requirements: CPU (optional)

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 34 points 2 months ago

And it probably won't be able to be upgraded by the user, which should be the bare minimum.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 months ago

And it ~~probably~~ absolutely guaran-fucking-teed won't be able to be upgraded by the user, which should be the bare minimum.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 34 points 2 months ago

Golly, thanks Apple. It's not like I can go buy a 256GB DIMM right now. 16GB what a joke.

[-] HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago

Whoa, that's like 32GB of Windows RAM. Seems excessive to me tbh

[-] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 16 points 2 months ago

The annoying thing is I have had people claim that 8GB and 16GB is fine on Apple and works better than on PC laptops. To the point one redditor point blank refused to believe I owned an Apple laptop. I literally had to take a photograph of said laptop and show it to them before they would believe me about the RAM capacity.

[-] x00z@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

You should have said "sure buddy" and ignored them.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] lengau@midwest.social 16 points 2 months ago

My Linux machine has 64 GiB of RAM, which is like 128 GiB of Mac RAM. It's still not enough

[-] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago

Serious question what are you using all that RAM for? I am having a hard time justifying upgrading one of my laptops to 32 GiB, nevermind 64 GiB.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[-] padge@lemmy.zip 26 points 2 months ago

My sister just bought a MacBook Air for college, and I had to beg her to spend the extra money on 16gb of memory. It feels like a scam that it appears cheap with the starting at price, but nobody should actually go with those "starting at" specs.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] masterspace@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Let me know how many multiple thousands of dollars it's going to cost for a MAX variant of the chip that can run three external monitors like it's 2008.

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

and maximum since you probably won't be able to upgrade it since silicon doesn't allow upgrades

[-] stellargmite@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Yeh can upgrade them at purchase. From 256gb storage to 512gb will only cost you one kidney.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nagaram@startrek.website 21 points 2 months ago

I don't really care unless it has the same price point as the 8gb one.

But we all know it won't be.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

Naturally the price for the cheapest model will also be going to up several orders of magnitude more than the cost of materials, labor, and healthy profit margin to account for that as well I'm sure.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Toes@ani.social 18 points 2 months ago

Why are apple products always so anemic on memory?

[-] Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz 19 points 2 months ago

Greed, it lowers the advertised price, but once you spec it decently you've added a grand in extras

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] luves2spooge@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Because there are two types of mac users:

  • People that are buying them with their own money because they're trendy and just using them as glorified Internet browsers. 16gb is plenty.
  • People using them professionally so their company is paying and Apple can over charge for the necessary memory upgrade
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

“640k ought to be enough for anyone.”

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
339 points (90.3% liked)

Technology

59590 readers
2941 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS