508
I like Python def (lemmy.world)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Reinsch@feddit.de 79 points 1 year ago

Ewww default exports. Explicit named exports are better! And so it begins

[-] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 1 year ago

How very dare you share my opinion!

[-] ShortFuse@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

PascalCase default exports for Classes

camelCase named exports for functions

ALL_CAPS named exports for constants

[-] the_beber@lemm.ee 41 points 1 year ago
[-] Andrew15_5@mander.xyz 33 points 1 year ago

How about some fn instead?

[-] MultipleAnimals@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
pub async fn foo() -> Pin>>>>>

oh fuck commonmark cant display the syntax :( well anyone who has done async rust can imagine

[-] flashgnash@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

p a f fn(){}

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Xylight@lemmy.xylight.dev 12 points 1 year ago

these puns are getting funcy

[-] LufyCZ@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

So much better

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sbv@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 year ago

fun is the punchable face of keywords. I don't know why, but I hate it.

[-] pivot_root@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Oh, you're no fun.

^I'll see myself out.^

[-] mvirts@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

For me it's friend

[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

I prefer good old def

[-] autokludge@programming.dev 11 points 1 year ago

How about some (defun)?

[-] darcy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

better than function

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] boletus@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 year ago

Python is fine as a language I guess

But python programmers give it a bad name. I've never seen "well written" python code, it's always shit that's been thrown together cos it works.

[-] herrvogel@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

I use python exclusively when I want to quickly throw some shit together that nobody's ever gonna spend any time maintaining, so that tracks.

[-] MrBlueSkies@feddit.uk 16 points 1 year ago

It badly needs strong typing. And braces.

[-] Anahkiasen@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago

Doesn't Python 3 have types? I've seen a few well typed codebases and it really made the code much easier to understand. Or is it just that it's not checking them strongly enough?

[-] kaesaecracker@leminal.space 5 points 1 year ago

The type annotations are just fancy comments. They do not do anything at runtime. If you have a function that takes an int someone can still pass in a list or anything else.

[-] boletus@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

The main advantage of typing for me is static linting.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] boletus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

I think python is good as it is for what it can do, mostly because I have no reason to use it.

What we need is lua with types!

[-] Shush@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago

Have you heard of Typescript-to-lua? I used to do Dota modding (which is in lua) with TSTL and it works great!

You write TS code (using Typescript syntax that includes types) and it is compiled into lua.

Wonder if that could be an alternative that can work for you.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

just put int_ or str_ in front of your variables

problem solved 😌

[-] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 16 points 1 year ago

When the grey beards wake up they're going to be fuming

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
508 points (92.9% liked)

Programmer Humor

32396 readers
633 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS