[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 2 points 17 minutes ago

2015 is the clear inflection point

[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 1 points 32 minutes ago

I'd call him Russell Hobbs

[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 2 points 59 minutes ago

Why do ducks even exist if chickens can do their job just fine??

[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 4 points 13 hours ago

Having a government backed research agency might be good seeing as that has declined in recent years.

[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 11 points 13 hours ago

What library are you using for that?

[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 2 points 13 hours ago

This, but in the shower.

[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 6 points 14 hours ago

That explains why their battery drains so fast!

[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

The best part of this is that the usability improvements made to linux by governments for their own use would also be reaped by the public if they chose to use it — since open spurce software is in effect a public good.

[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 2 points 14 hours ago

The original was actually scheduled to the minute

The "Second Annual Synchronized Global Orgasm for Peace" was scheduled for 6:08 (UTC) on 22 December 2007, the moment of the solstice.

1
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml to c/wikipedia@lemmy.world
762
Ducks (lemmy.ml)
submitted 2 days ago by SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
148
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
31
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml to c/technology@slrpnk.net

Currently, talking to a face is the ultimate guarantee that you are communicating with a human (and on a subconscious level makes you try to relate, empathise, etc.). If humanoid robot technology eventually surpasses the Uncanny Valley, discovering that I'm talking to a humanoid with an LLM and that my intuitions had been betrayed would undermine the instinctive trust I give to the other party when I see a human face. This would degrade my social interactions across the board, because I'd live in constant suspicion that the humans I was talking to weren't actually human.

It is for this reason I think it should be the law that humanoid robots must be clearly differentiated from humans. Or at least that people should have the right to opt out from encountering realistic-looking humanoids.

226
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml to c/pics@lemmy.world

https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/collection/1692/fall-colors

Has the orange season come to your part of the world yet?

313
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world

I've just been reading about how in the future, AI will allow us to speak with animals, and people will be able to communicate telepathically and live in their own VR worlds. (etc., etc.)

Man, this isn't a world I want to live in. I'm so tired of the constant paradigm shifting that you have to put your brain through with each innovation. I wish technology just stayed frozen in the 1980s – there would be so much less uncertainty in my life and I could just focus on being a human.

Innovation keeps being forced on you and I just feel tired. >!And I'm only just in my 20s!< Is this ok? Is this valid? When resisting it is a loser's game...

1
Sator Square (en.wikipedia.org)
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml to c/wikipedia@lemmy.world

What the hell is this?

49
52
67

It would be far more consistent with the pronunciation of other similar words.

13
31
view more: next ›

SubArcticTundra

joined 1 year ago