this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
270 points (99.3% liked)

[Dormant, move to !television@lemm.ee] Shows and TV

1735 readers
1 users here now

Please move to !television@lemm.ee

Open discussion of Media / Shows / Television

  1. Be nice
  2. Don't go off topic
  3. Don't rage farm

Other communities

We are still open to mod application, please comment on this post: https://lemm.ee/post/40675177

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] drolex@sopuli.xyz 35 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Very nice.

I'm curious to see how corporate will still manage to make it a hurdle. "Your honor, it's still a one-click cancellation, the subscriber only has to click it with his toes while standing on his head in a wolf's den"

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Its not defined as "one click" in the law.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You made me curious, and you are correct that "click" is nowhere in the document.

It does seem to further refine the original intent of the law. My takeaway was it is now required to unsubscribe in the same way you sign up. If you can sign up online, you can quit online, not only by calling a number or visiting a place in person. If you signed up in person, you can quit in person, not call a number no one will answer.

There's a few other new provisions too, such as allowing for termination if the price of the subscription changes. Overall, it seems to improve on what was there.

I'm not in California, so I didn't read it word for word, as it won't apply to me, but it was interesting to get more of the truth. If you want to see the full text with the amendments highlighted, here you go.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It was a total guess but lawmakers are no stranger to making things as verbose as is needed.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

People complain about how long and wordy all these rules are, but it's exactly the situation as in the top comment where people will weasel through whatever loopholes they can find if they think it gives them an edge at getting to people's money. I hope these changes make it a more effective law and that some of us outside of CA can enjoy the same benefits someday soon.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 15 points 9 months ago

i dunno it was kind of satisfying to tell spotify to eat shit through 5 pages of "are you sure you want to cancel/ why?" bullshit

[–] Fish@midwest.social 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

One more reason to use California as my VPN location

[–] Devdogg@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

~~IIRC the governor of CA said no way and vetoed this bill.~~

Edit: see my comment below.