The Staggering Price You’re Paying for America’s Nuclear Makeover (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 1 month ago by UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

To understand how America is preparing for its nuclear future, follow Melissa Durkee’s fifth-grade students as they shuffle into Room 38 at Preston Veterans’ Memorial School in Preston, Conn. One by one, the children settle in for a six-week course taught by an atypical educator, the defense contractor General Dynamics.

“Does anyone know why we’re here?” a company representative asks. Adalie, 10, shoots her hand into the air. “Um, because you’re building submarines and you, like, need people, and you’re teaching us about it in case we’re interested in working there when we get older,” she ventures.

Adalie is correct. The U.S. Navy has put in an order for General Dynamics to produce 12 nuclear ballistic missile submarines by 2042 — a job that’s projected to cost $130 billion. The industry is struggling to find the tens of thousands of new workers it needs. For the past 18 months, the company has traveled to elementary schools across New England to educate children in the basics of submarine manufacturing and perhaps inspire a student or two to consider one day joining its shipyards.

all 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] KITA@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 month ago

The staggering price is... trying to get kids excited in a specific field? Maybe I should have read the article to figure out exactly what the headline is trying to say but having to scroll through pictures to actually read is infuriating.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

The staggering price is…

$1.7T, per the article. The scope of the project is so big that businesses are trying to groom kids into their fields at the elementary school tier, because the demand for future military industry complex jobs will be so huge.

It goes on to note the scope of the project, in terms of human labor demands, ecological impacts, community economic impacts, and brain-drain on neighboring industries.

Maybe I should have read the article

:-/

[-] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Maybe I should have read the article

In their defense, the article is extremely obnoxious to read (at least on mobile). We shouldn't have to scroll past dozens of huge images and 'interactive' graphics just to get to the actual text... and that's with an ad blocker installed — I imagine it's even worse without one.

[-] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

What’s the alternative?

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Don't spend this enormous sum of resources and manpower on a system we will - in the best case scenario - never use.

Instead, invest the effort in building domestic surpluses of clean energy, transportation, and housing, recycling the existing surplus of consumer waste, and repairing damage to the domestic ecology so as to increase the survivability of the human species into the next century.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Oh no but the world is so dangerous and they hate our freedom dontchaknow. /s

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

A handful of hydrogen bombs could wipe all live off the face of the earth, but we need to have 100x that in our arsenal set to a hair's trigger, just in case.

this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024

20 points (72.7% liked)

politics

19107 readers

2924 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News