1
submitted 1 year ago by lvxferre@lemmy.ml to c/linguistics@lemmy.ml

This paper from Silvia Luraghi explores the origin of PIE grammatical gender system, as well as proposing how it appeared in the language, in a way that accounts for the following discrepancy:

  • Hittite - two genders system: animate and inanimate
  • Late PIE - typically three genders system: masculine, feminine, and neuter

The animate and inanimate genders would've been inherited by late PIE as the masculine and neuter genders respectively, while the feminine would be the result of a derivational suffix *-h₂ being attached to words, and eventually triggering agreement. Note that the typical IE feminine /a/ (you see it in Latin/Romance and Slavic languages, for example) is believed to be from *h₂, as it's the a-colouring laryngeal.

I know that this paper might be a bit too deep for most folks here to parse, so if you feel intimidated, don't be afraid to ask for help.

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Linguistics

2 readers
1 users here now

This community was migrated to !linguistics@mander.xyz (Kbin link).

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS