901
submitted 2 weeks ago by Sunshine@lemmy.ca to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kava@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

Statement: government in Ukraine changed in 2014.

Your response: that new government had the support of the people, therefore that statement is false

This is a non-sequitor. The government either changed or it didn't. Whether the people supported it or not doesn't fundamentally change the statement.

I'm starting to think you are a bot, someone with very low reading comprehension, or simply a malicious actor.

If you refuse to engage in this attempt to reach a set of facts we can agree on, then we will never move forward.

I could say the sky is blue and the grass is green and you would yell me I am justifying capitalism's embrace of carbon emissions and the death of the climate.

[-] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 199 points 2 weeks ago

Once you are under dictatorship, you can't vote to hold anyone accountable. Vote for Trump and you won't have a say in what happens to Gaza. Or anything else.

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 117 points 2 weeks ago

yea, but you get to brag to all the other inmates in the political prison yard that you stood up for your principles by not voting!

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

They'll be in the same political prisons as their primary enemies, the classic liberal Dems.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (64 replies)
[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago

Exactly.

"In four years, you don't have to vote again. We'll have it fixed so good, you're not gonna have to vote." - Trump

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io 118 points 2 weeks ago

“Gaza is not the only issue” should not be the takeaway here:

“Even on this issue [Gaza], Donald Trump and his right-wing friends are worse,” Sanders said in the six-minute video, which he posted to X. He noted that Republicans have fought to block humanitarian aid to Gaza and that Trump — who has praised Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu — has suggested Gaza would be a great site for beachfront development.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 113 points 2 weeks ago

Protest voting doesn't work when the candidate you are protesting is the least worst option. Democrats that will not vote out of principle have been conned as badly as MAGA republicans. End of story.

load more comments (18 replies)
[-] Bobmighty@lemmy.world 78 points 2 weeks ago

If you want to engage those bad faith accounts, don't respond to the Gaza thing; that's a trap. Instead, ask about other issues like climate issues, housing issues, food insecurity problems, etc. ask them what their third party candidate has planned for that and ask for evidence of these plans. They'll move goalposts and attempt to get back on Gaza. Keep them coming back to those other issues that affect Americans daily. Many of those accounts are here to derail conversation. Derail them in turn and force the conversation back on track.

Or do what I do and downvote then block, then post the occasional reminder that most of those accounts are bad faith at best.

[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago

I know. I mean I’m not a huge fan of Harris’ Gaza stance. Honestly I’m not sure why it’s political at all to call what Israel is doing wrong. But come on, Trump will be 100 times worse. And that’s just on the Israel/Gaza thing. I’m not sure how you can look at these two and decide that Harris is wrong enough about the Gaza thing that you come to the conclusion that either a third party or Trump vote is warranted. Which makes me believe is not genuine and likely foreign agent spreading chaos and misinformation.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

It's because there is a large, internally-polled segment of the Pennsylvania electorate who are Jewish and sympathetic to Israel.

Harris can't afford to not court them.

I have no doubt she vehemently dislikes Bibi and would wish to cut aid.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 65 points 2 weeks ago

Here come the tankies to call Bernie Sanders BlueMAGA in 3...2...

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world 55 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Bernie is such a good guy. The Dems have done him dirty so many times, they are currently continuing to support many harmful policies but he understands what's at stake and he puts all of that aside to do the best he can.

He doesn't have to do this. He's 83 years old and while his cognitive health is outstanding for his age, someone his age doesn't need to be on this grind for us. He probably won't stop until he's forced to due to his health. I love the guy and it's a shame we weren't given the chance to see him take the presidency.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

He is a leader.

I remember that old footage of him in Burlington in the 70's, talking to random kids in the mall, asking them what was important to them--drug policy, free speech, good schools--and just talking to them about how they could make a difference. From the bully pulpit, he would have been transformative.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 50 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The fantasy world the zero-tolerance high-ground morality angels live in is as dangerous as the one MAGA lives in, and ironically has the same victims. They proudly polish their halos nice and shiny while they let the world burn.

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 17 points 2 weeks ago

Don't support genocide, it's as simple as that!

By the way: Voting isn't actually support. The American system is not set up in a way where votes actually add to the power of the Presidential office. On the other hand, making a deliberate choice not to act does mean supporting whatever happens without your action, which could be genocide. This means YOU HAVE TO VOTE HARRIS IN ORDER TO NOT SUPPORT GENOCIDE. The socialism angels are hypocrites.

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

there are two facts about this election

  1. there are only two outcomes—0.0% chance for a third party win
  2. both candidates have a bad stance on the genocide

so neither outcome will help with the genocide. acting like voting third party helps in any way shape or form is disingenuous at best. so what should you do?

my argument is that you should vote for the person you can hope to convince on this issue. phone calls, protests, social media, whatever means you have... which of these candidates is more likely to respond to any kind of public pressure about this?

Harris might be responsive, and let's be honest, she might not be. but you know for a fact that it's definitely not the fucking orange turd. Natenyahu wants him to win. how can you ignore that?

load more comments (46 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] BigBenis@lemmy.world 50 points 2 weeks ago

I was a Bernie-or-Bust-er in 2016 because I was confident Hilary was going to win with or without my vote. I deeply regret taking that stance and feel like I let down every woman who's lost rights to their bodily autonomy, every family who was separated at the border, everybody whose life was lost or ruined due to the Trump administration's incompetent response to the COVID-19 outbreak, and everybody else who has been harmed by the Trump administration.

Don't be like me. It sucks having to vote for the lesser of two evils but that's how our system works and not voting or voting third-party isn't going to change that but it does run the risk of things getting a lot worse.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Orbituary@lemmy.world 50 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not sure why people haven't been saying this more.

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 weeks ago

I have been. It tends to get downvoted by both extremes on Lemmy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] frezik@midwest.social 19 points 2 weeks ago

It's a fundamentally uncomfortable position. The people of Gaza matter, and we can be pretty sure that Harris will continue current Biden Admin policies on it. You can't argue for the hundred other policies at stake without knowingly allowing genocide to happen with US approval.

But here's the thing: there are two very prominent Jewish people who don't believe for a second that both sides are the same. One of them is Bernie Sanders. The other is Benjamin Netanyahu.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 48 points 2 weeks ago

That's a bad headline. Watch his video, he makes a much more nuanced argument.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 45 points 2 weeks ago

Hey look, someone finally posted an article about this so the mods don't remove it!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 42 points 2 weeks ago

Not voting for a candidate is not the only, nor the most effective way to push a party to change positions on an issue you care about.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Clbull@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago

Anybody voting against Harris over Gaza is a moron. Trump may be even more pro Israel...

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Gaza is hardly even an issue on the ballot, you're picking between slow genocide and fast genocide.

[-] lurklurk@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

Slow genocide is better though. We all get that right?

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago

Certainly gives us more time to try to do something about it, yeah.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

Unfortunately Gaza is a non issue. The situation would only be handled worse under the other candidate. Along with just about every other conceivable thing.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

America voting for the lesser evil since 1792.

It's not the time to stop now. But I better see all of you on the streets with signs on November 6th.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
901 points (96.1% liked)

politics

19088 readers
3627 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS