465
submitted 1 year ago by honeynut@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] autotldr 4 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Starr County Judge Eloy Vera said it will start south of the Falcon Dam and go past Salineño, Texas.

There’s a lot of arroyos,” Eloy Vera, the county judge said, pointing out the creeks cutting through the ranchland and leading into the river.

Concern is shared with environmental advocates who say structures will run through public lands, habitats of endangered plants and species like the Ocelot, a spotted wild cat.

And it’s a horrific step backwards for the borderlands,” Laiken Jordahl, a southwest conservation advocate for the Center for Biological Diversity, said Wednesday afternoon.

The DHS decision on Wednesday contrasts the Biden administration’s posturing when a proclamation to end the construction on Jan. 20, 2021 stated, “building a massive wall that spans the entire southern border is not a serious policy solution.”

“After years of denying that a border wall and other physical barriers are effective, the DHS announcement represents a sea change in the administration’s thinking: A secure wall is an effective tool for maintaining control of our borders,” Dan Stein, president of the Federation for American Immigration Reform, said in a statement.


The original article contains 684 words, the summary contains 184 words. Saved 73%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] zephyreks@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Biden's executive order to halt construction on the wall didn't work too well, did it?

For reference, the Trump administration built 458 miles of wall.

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago

And how many illegal immigrants did that 458 mile wall stop?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago
[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Here's what looks like an answer: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/jun/30/joe-biden-forced-build-donald-trumps-border-wall/

TLDR: This is a 2019 law passed by Congress during the baby hands administration. The Biden administration has been pretty careful not to overstep other branches of government(I think as a direct response to how flagrantly and harmfully baby hands used executive action), and while Biden returned wall money taken from the DoD, the rest of the wall money was explicitly designated by Congress for building the border wall in 2019 and Congress will not cancel that legislative order(wall funds), despite Biden asking Congress to cancel the 2019 wall funds law since arriving in office in 2020.

This post is misleading, the money is being legally used for a legislatively required purpose and any federal laws are being broken legislatively by Congress as a result of baby hands in 2019, not the Biden administration.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
465 points (95.9% liked)

World News

32500 readers
667 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS