273
Mutually assured tariffs
Trump keeps praising McKinley for his tariffs, but I guess he completely forgot that it famously failed, caused prices to skyrocket for all Americans, and the Republican party handily lost in midterms and the next election.
Golly, you don’t suppose the outcome of this trade squabble could push Mexico straight into China’s loving embrace, thereby achieving exactly the opposite of the ostensible goals of the trump tariffs? All whilst driving up prices in the US? Do you??
Russia is okay with it. If they could I'm sure they would orchestrate such things to happen
We need aliens in the near future like asap... if it was ever going to be a thing we need real life aliens. They will either kill us all or bring us together as a species and unite us all together... Maybe then we can get our shit together
Nah we’ll just slap some tariffs on them too
By doing things like supporting the rise of one of their assets to the presidency?
Oh
They are.
No, definitely not. The only way to lower prices is to raise them drastically. You see, if you don't let these supposed "economists" and "third graders who understand addition" tell you otherwise, you can easily see that this is a fucking brilliant plan. That's why the astute American public bought it. Because they're so educated.
Your second sentence made me think of this.
Because they're so educated.
Reminds me of that guy that said he "loved the ~~poorly~~ educated" Wonder what happened to him...
That’s exactly how tariffs work. 2 countries fucking themselves over to see who has the bigger dick. China will impose tariffs also on us.
Obviously, as that's trade economy 101.
Don't Canada/Mexico/US have free trading agreements? The US is going to exit them?
The current agreement (known as USMCA or NAFTA 2.0) was signed in 2018 and took effect in 2020. Trump wants to use the 6-year renegotiation provision that is in the deal to fuck with Canada and Mexico even more than the current deal does.
That explains why Canada is being treated in the same way that Mexico, if the US wants to apply the tarifs in the USMCA treat it had to be applied to both
if the US wants to apply the tarifs in the USMCA treat it had to be applied to both
I'm not sure that it's mandatory (within the agreement) that tariffs must be unilateral. I suspect the orange asshole is simply doing it to both nations so that he appears to be taking a strong stance on the "Buy American" mantra.
I'm not an expert on international commerce, but I don't think it make sense to have a multinational trade aggrentment where every country have different deals with each other
True.
The same could be said of a multi-national agreement that gets revisited every six years at the whim of one leader.
It just seems like it.
I’m sure my Canadian Government will follow this up with a strongly worded letter to the Americans asking if it’s OK if they impose tariffs, too.
Worse. Polinever is asking Trudeau to do tax cuts to offset it.
I was curious what exactly the US exports to Mexico. Apparently it’s mostly oil.
Don't forget to make it double the tariffs to America.
insert shocked face here
this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
273 points (97.9% liked)
News
23397 readers
3524 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS