this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
580 points (97.1% liked)

politics

25235 readers
4278 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 215 points 2 years ago (4 children)

to which an excited Trump — "leaning" toward Pratt as if to be discreet — then told Pratt two pieces of information about U.S. submarines: the supposed exact number of nuclear warheads they routinely carry, and exactly how close they supposedly can get to a Russian submarine without being detected.

Holy fucking fuck.

This guy needs to be in jail. He’s deliberately leaked sources and methods, national nuclear information, and intelligence on foreign forces. Never in the history of the country has there been such a person in charge of national security. He is such a total waste that he thinks the president of the fucking United States needs to show off in front of foreign government officials by leaking national security secrets.

What an absolute piece of shallow-ego shit.

[–] wolf6152@lemm.ee 113 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And he did it for clout, to impress somebody. He couldn’t even be a normal traitor and do it for money or idealogical reasons.

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And if he does that for clout, what would he tell if say, someone knew some insider shit he’s been up to?

Someone that has access to top-notch intel gathering.

Someone…. Russian.

Hands down, there’s no doubt Putin knows everything about our military. Everything.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago

Probably more than Putin knows about his own armed forces.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And how many enlisted men will continue to support him and vote for him? How many vets will give up their families instead of giving up their cult-like reverence for him?

Just an astounding level of ignorance in this country.

[–] whofearsthenight@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago

Actually, at this point it's more than ignorance, it's straight up malice. We have to understand that the proles on the right live in an echo chamber and will never see this story, and that's by design. Between the Fox News deliberately and knowingly misleading the country about it, and more important, the entire Republican Party (with your occasional Liz Cheney, Adam Kinzinger, Mitt Romney, etc.) it hard for the rank and file to have any real clue what's going on. Toss in years of ensuring that their base is not educated through their deliberate dismantling of public education and religious indoctrination. It's extremely important to note that you don't get to Trump without the entire party of complicit cowards who are either ignoring the damage he's doing, or are actively encouraging it because they're traitorous fucks, and that it hasn't happened overnight. This has been a very long game, and it's not an accident.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

There have been folks lock away forever or banned to Russia for doing less than Trump.

[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 93 points 2 years ago (2 children)

“If that’s all that was discussed, we already know all that,” he told the Times. “We have had Australians serving with Americans on U.S. submarines for years, and we share the same technology and the same weapons as the U.S. Navy.”

This is such bs. If a dem had revealed classified information like this rep's would be frothing at the mouth.

[–] horsey@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

If a democrat had done 1/10th of the things trump and his admin did, they would still be freaking out about it. Biden hasn’t even really done anything illegal or questionable and republicans have been trying to impeach him anyway.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

They're frothing at the mouth to imprison Hunter Biden for a gun crime that's pretty much never prosecuted that they're actively trying to get taken off the books.

[–] TheJims@lemmy.world 58 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We may never know the full extent of the damage to our national security and that of our allies Trump caused. All because of Trump’s inability to just shut the fuck up.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 47 points 2 years ago (2 children)

He also causally revealed exactly how incredibly good the visual fidelity of our geosynchronous surveillance satellites are because he wanted to brag about it on Fox.

Outside of the NRO, nobody even knew that that level of optical fidelity was even possible with modern technology. That shit is amongst the most classified stuff in the country. Right up there with, you know, exactly how close one of our SSNs can get to various types of Russian subs without getting detected.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone -5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The image was cleared for release and redacted before release, hence the black square in the top left.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You’re not getting what I’m saying.

Even in redacted form, the imaging capabilities are quite far beyond what commercial satellites can do. Trump insisted that he was going to publicly release the image (and thus implicitly reveal the optical fidelity and orbital dynamics of what’s probably considered a top-5 intelligence gathering device in the world - and we also likely have the other four, too) simply because he is a man-child with no self control who wanted to troll on Iran for a bit. There was zero strategic gain to be had from revealing that. The effectiveness of the satellite is now substantially reduced, because now state actors know precisely how big a thing can be before it can detect them, as well as the exact angles that you’d need to deploy visual obfuscation to hide a thing.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 53 points 2 years ago

People who hang around him have said - multiple people, many accounts - he’ll just say the same thing over and over, for the entire conversation, for hours.

He ain’t right. Not that it matters a whit to his cult.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If there really was a deep state even half as hostile to donnie as his cultist apes think there is, they would have found a way to dispose of him a while ago.

[–] horsey@lemm.ee 19 points 2 years ago

2 presidents have been gunned down, but to trump, “no one has ever been treated as unfairly as I have”.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

This thought has never crossed my mind but now that I've read it, I can't imagine it isn't the truth

[–] e_mc2@feddit.nl 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well no shit. If there's one thing consistent with this orange baffoon, it's that he's constantly spiling whatever beans there are to spill. Whether it's self-incriminating blabbermouthing in one of his zillion law suits or casually discussing nuclear secrets with whoever wants to hear them, this sorry excuse for a human being doesn't know when to shut the fuck up.

[–] TheJims@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He’s not capable of shutting the fuck up. His personality disorders won’t allow him to shut the fuck up. He has zero impulse control. It’s no wonder North Korea, Russia and every other hostile foreign government welcome him with open arms.

[–] LarryTheMatador@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[–] thorbot@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Where all my presidential assassins at these days?

[–] creamed_eels@toast.ooo 7 points 2 years ago

That reminds me of a tweet I saw about about the 2016 release of John Hinckley Jr. from the psych hospital. It went something like this:

“JH Jr to be released from custody”

“Well I hope he’s ready to go back, because we need him again.”

[–] Jackcooper@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That joke on lemmy prob not worth a SS visit

[–] thorbot@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Oh I’d never dream of what you’re implying. It was just a simple question

[–] ImmortanStalin@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 years ago

He needs to start playing nice with China for that to happen lol

[–] Lioffproxy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Playing for team trump, riding in lil rascals with their ar's in each bloated sausage fingered hands.

[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Worst. Present. Ever.