48
submitted 1 year ago by shreddy_scientist@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CantaloupeAss@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago
[-] BlinkerFluid@lemmy.one -2 points 1 year ago

Looks like my next vote will be tied to a brick.

[-] Bananigans@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 year ago

This is getting reposted everywhere even though people in the comments are constantly giving the correct information on why this happened. Just giving you a heads-up so you're not to quick to tie your vote to someone else's willful misunderstanding of the separation of powers.

[-] Hyggyldy@sffa.community -2 points 1 year ago

So who is forcing him to waive laws? What will happen if he doesn't?

[-] Hyggyldy@sffa.community -3 points 1 year ago
[-] MishMash@lemm.ee 36 points 1 year ago

There were funds appropriated for a portion of the wall in 2019 by Trump with the requirement that construction is completed by the end of 2023. Biden asked congress to reappropriate the funds, as he does not have the power to do so, and congress refused. His hands are mostly tied here from what I understand.

[-] the_post_of_tom_joad@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

So they're using the parliamentarian defense again eh? I didn't buy it then and it won't fly now

[-] Hyggyldy@sffa.community 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sounds like bs to me. He had to waive laws to do this. And if he didn't do this what would happen? Would he get in trouble with the super president?

[-] the_post_of_tom_joad@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah Congress didn't tie his hands and force him to override laws (which by the acts definition should only be invoked to protect the nation against threats).

He could just add easily declare his hands tied by the 26 laws he is instead breaking. He could say the wall's completion wouldn't do anything to enhance national security (something i recall libs saying when it was trumps wall).

This is a lie, plain and simple.

[-] prd@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

Sounds like you a passionate about the topic, do some more reading do you can understand.

[-] Hyggyldy@sffa.community -2 points 1 year ago

So you can't tell me what's forcing the president to do this? What repercussions he'd face and from where?

[-] prd@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Don’t be lazy, if you care so much look it up. The other poster already explained it for you and you chose not to believe it.

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

"President" is not "King"

Money is controlled by Republican Congress.

Republican Congress is not controlled by Democrat President.

[-] Maoo@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

Yes you're recognizing the liberal urge to defend fascist behavior

[-] shiveyarbles@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Your inability to process information provided to you makes any discourse impractical.

[-] Hyggyldy@sffa.community 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Cool. You feel better now that you've joined late and got a meaningless jab in? Got that dopamine hit?

[-] halvo317@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Waive laws? Lol. He would get impeached because that's breaking the law.

[-] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Ok, so it's a nothing burger headline designed for rage.

I hate the algorithm.

[-] Kuori@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago

hahahahahahaha "the man in charge of the country and the political party in power have no say! they have to do the incredibly evil thing! the money couldn't just sit there and not get used, that would be a worse sin than putting up barbed wire and machine gun nests"

[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago

His hands are mostly tied here

doubt

this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
48 points (80.8% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7177 readers
1400 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS