this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
544 points (97.4% liked)

Google

2091 readers
1 users here now

A Lemmy community dedicated to Google products and everything Google.

Rules

  1. Keep it Google.
  2. Keep it SFW.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 92 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I had to use the mobile version of Chrome recently on a locked down work device with an MDM policy that prevented installation of other browsers. It made me realize I had no idea just how far gone the mobile web has become with ads.

As an experiment I grabbed a random article on my Google News feed for today and opened it in Chrome with no ad blocking allowed and Samsung Internet with ad blocking enabled to compare.

Chrome produces a nightmarish hell scape of ads that just gets worse the further down you scroll.

Samsung Internet isn't perfect because there is still a large banner taking up space at the top of the screen, but it blocks all of the ads in the article along with the website's own ads for other articles.

The cynic in me, however, acknowledges that the truth of the situation looks more like this, even with ad blocking enabled.

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Thanks for the this, I got a chuckle. Especially gizmodo...

[–] Hotdogman@lemmy.world 87 points 2 years ago (1 children)

aD BloCkeRs aRe RuINinG oUR wEbSitE!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de 74 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Weird, I don't see anything like this on firefox.

[–] carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works 44 points 2 years ago (2 children)

What godawful browser is injecting that ai nonsense? The ads are bad enough but the browser itself seems to be using 1/3rd of the screen

[–] icedterminal@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

This is on an iPhone. They're using Microsoft's Edge "browser" which is just a reskinned Safari.

For those who don't know, Apple's developer terms explicitly state:

2.5.6 Apps that browse the web must use the appropriate WebKit framework and WebKit JavaScript.

https://developer.apple.com/app-store/review/guidelines/

[–] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] philodendron@lemdro.id 5 points 2 years ago

Idk why the other guys saying it’s some edge browser. This is the google app on iPhone. The bottom part pops up when you click on articles because they’re pushing their AI summaries. It’s actually a great feature but it’s annoying how much space it takes up

[–] Illuminati@lemmy.world 43 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Honestly web browsing on mobile has been a piece of sh1t for a long time, without adblockers it's a total cancer.

And even with an adblocker it's always the god damn cookie popups...

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

Firefox has a plugin called I Don't Care About Cookies, Which basically just ignores the pop-ups and auto except / rejects them, but for some strange reason that plugins you can add to the mobile version of Firefox are extremely limited.

Essentially the plugin implements the functionality that should have been mandated under the cookie law to begin with which makes the choice browser side rather than web side

[–] Klaymore@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago (6 children)

I think ublock has a block list for cookie notices as well

[–] rothaine@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

OMG why aren't these checked by default

[–] Illuminati@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I had the lists activated but they still didn't work.

Just activated the Adguard ones and I'm not seeing any more cookies crap for now, thanks.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] AProfessional@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

You can install any extension in the beta version. Some won’t work though.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 40 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Firefox and uBlock Origin…. Now sadly I wish I could find something like that on iPhone.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Change the phone dns to nextdns.io or adguards dns. Use dns over https if possible.

[–] Alivrah@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

I use 1blocker on the iPhone. Unfortunately (iirc) they stopped doing lifetime purchase and went the subscription route. Luckily I purchased it before they did that.

It works great.

[–] Crow@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

iPhone has AdGuard pro.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Setup a PiHole. Not 100% guaranteed but it stops a lot.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

Firefox and reader mode is your best option for mobile.

[–] tromars@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not sure atm what the extension I use for safari on iPhone is called, but it works great for me. I‘ll look it up when I get to it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ScoobyDoo27@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

Just use adguard on an iPhone. I see 0 ads across all apps I use.

[–] wabafee@lemm.ee 27 points 2 years ago

I love how it just keep getting worst as I scroll.

[–] BlinkerFluid@lemmy.one 25 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Why do you choose to view ads? Inaction is a choice.

[–] akakevbot@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Yup. I work from home and have a pihole on my network at home so I've gotten used to not seeing the ads.

Was browsing on mobile data while on the road and was reminded why its necessary. It was unbearable.

[–] ObsidianZed@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I do the same with an (almost) always-on vpn to the same pi with wireguard set up. I use Tasker on Android to auto start the wireguard tunnel if I disconnect from my home Wi-Fi. I typically only disable it if I'm running into issues with an app etc, and I'm too lazy to dig into and whitelist any relevant domain.

[–] vox@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 years ago

use nextdns

[–] LazerFX@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

I'm working on setting up a VPN, so even when mobile I'll connect back through my home network to view filtered adverts. At least, I might end up using DNS from my home anyway.

[–] TeamDman@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Would be nice if such behaviour tanked SEO

[–] rip_art_bell@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

From what I understand, web crawlers see a totally different version of the site than users do

[–] TeamDman@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Only due to using a different user agent, it's totally possible to build a for-the-people pagerank that would see what we see and deprioritize stuff like ads and fluff on recipe pages

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] misanthropy@lemm.ee 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What, you don't enjoy ads on your articles that are also ads?

[–] jcit878@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

don't you enjoy discussing with your friends and family what interesting ads you've seen lately? - what marketers think people actually do

[–] Kuro@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

And yet they're baffled as to why so many people use adblockers

[–] LemmyNameMyself@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago
[–] Anonymousllama@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Spot on for what browsing without adblockers looks like. What a hellscape

load more comments
view more: next ›