47

The Gaza Strip seems very poorly served by the Palestinian Authority, let alone Israel. But, the area has relatively stable borders and it would likely have a stable government in Hamas. So, what if Gaza just declared independence as the government with sole control over the Gaza Strip?

Would Gaza get recognized by other countries? Could it parlay the recognition into forcing a permanent peace with Israel as becoming a recognized country puts Israeli treatment of it into more known sections of international law?

all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] pacology@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

I’m not an expert in middle eastern politics.

My uninformed take is that if the Gaza Strip was to self organize as a state, they will implicitly recognize Israel as a state as they will have to decide on borders.

Being unrecognized allows the Palestinian authority to claim all the former Palestinian land as their own.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but I'm also saying that the government in Gaza would not be the Palestinian Authority, but something else. The recognition of Israel would be problematic given local politics, but I don't see Palestine pushing all of Israel out.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don’t see Palestine pushing Israel back an inch. They just launched their biggest assault in 50 years and all they achieved was killing a bunch of civilians. As far as I can tell they hold no territory outside of Gaza and it’s only been a couple of days.

Edit: Reuters is reporting there are still some Hamas fighters holed up in Israeli territory but with no realistic means of resupply or relief it’s only a matter of time before they’re dead.

[-] nicetomeetyouIMVEGAN 30 points 1 year ago

This is already the defacto situation for palestine. It is already recognized by many countries. Treaties have been signed. We've been close to a two state solution in 2007 when PLO was in power. Hamas however is not about being at peace with the situation and aims at the dismantling of Israel. It wants an Islamic state from the east to the west. At multiple occasions has it sabotaged a two state solution through violence. Hamas is everything but stable, it is an Islamic extremist faction. The threat of hamas/isis has put religious extremist nationalist factions into power in Israel also fueled by people with a religious conviction. Just that the land of the palestinians belongs to the jews. They are not particularly interested in peaceful coexistence as seperate countries either.

I think most people have given up hope of a two state solution. It looks further away than ever.

https://www.un.org/unispal/history/

[-] JossyBop@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Nothing would change. For a start, PA doesn't control gaza so can't service it, and secondly israel and Egypt are both blockading Gaza. Independent Gaza would continue to have nothing.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club -5 points 1 year ago

Except that a blockade is an act of war and a lot of other international laws start applying to the conflict.

[-] iforgotmyinstance@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Palestine, like Taiwan, has a non-voting representative in the UN. It's effectively its own country save for the key players of the Security Council recognizing them.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 year ago

But I'm not talking about Palestine declaring themselves a country, but the Gaza Strip as independent of both Israel and the Palestinian Authority.

[-] boyi@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They are not going to declare independence from the whole Palestin, very unlikely so. Even though they are separated from the West Bank, they have a lot of supporters there. People in the West Bank even voted in majority for them in 2006. The only reason they can't rule the West Bank is because Fatah has greater number of henchmen there and Fatah got the support from Israel and the West to cling to power.

Currently if you study the maps of their movements, their forces is moving towards the West Bank, at one time just 10km from it. And they have been making many pleas in the social media to invite those in the west bank to join them. So, they've been quite a number of incidence of attacks in the areas around the west bank, indicating that they are gaining more supports.

So the trend now is for them to unite instead of separated into different entity.

[-] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 10 points 1 year ago

The Gaza strip is effectively ruled by Hamas, which rule without election since 2006. If they're to declare independence, aren't they need to elect a legitimate government first?

[-] uniqueid198x@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago

'legitimate government' isn't really a thing. Many recognized countries are ruled by hereditary governments, or by autocrats who gained power in a coup. The legitimacy of such governments, andthe nationhood of the states, is recognized by other countries based on the foreign policy (mostly self interest) of those other countries. So, if you want to guess who would recognize a Gaza nation with Hamas as the ruling clique, ask yourself what governments would benifit from doing that.

[-] HardlightCereal@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

Australia is ruled by an illegitimate king and it's still recognised.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club -3 points 1 year ago

You would need an election to happen, and I don't know if Israel would let one happen.

[-] Delphia@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You think Hamas is going to let a free and uncorrupt election run and risk losing their power and influence?

[-] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

They can declare whatever they want, but if the major nations of the world do not recognize their declaration as valid and support them then it's a hollow victory. The PLO declared an independent Palestinian state back in 1988. Many nations recognize it as an independent state today, and many nations do not.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_recognition_of_the_State_of_Palestine

[-] plistig@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

A "Gaza country" would lie between Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, and Grenada the list list of countries by size (place 185). and between Lithuania, and Qatar in the list of countries by population size (Place 140). With no agriculture to speak of. How could such a county exist?

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 6 points 1 year ago

A lot of other countries in the Middle East are net importers of food. Also, it isn't like they would be making their food situation worse.

[-] redballooon@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why do you think Hamas would be interested in peace with Israel? They very explicitly have never been and are not.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 year ago

I don't. This is just a what if, questioning what is happening.

[-] protovack@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

"it would likely have a stable government in Hamas"

....re-read that to yourself a few times.

this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
47 points (86.2% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35810 readers
1282 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS