829

Summary

Elon Musk faced backlash from his followers on X after advocating for importing “super talented engineers” to address a shortage in the U.S. tech industry.

Musk likened hiring top foreign talent to building a championship sports team and argues that there is a shortage of talented and motivated American engineers.

Critics argued there’s sufficient U.S. talent being overlooked or underpaid, with some pointing to widespread tech layoffs.

Musk dismissed claims of low wages or training gaps, maintaining a need for exceptional engineering talent to advance innovation.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 4 points 2 days ago

When I voted for the leopards ate my face party I didn't think that the leopards would eat their own faces ;)

[-] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 days ago

I'll believe any negative Elon news when it starts to actually hurt his pocketbook or well-being or life.

Until then I am apt to just consider it clickbait.

I dream of the day he's held accountable for something in a major way, but like my desire for that for Trump, I just have my doubts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago

"Immigrants for me, and go... fuck... yourself."

- Elon basically

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

Huh no way, the oligarch is going to make things worse for people in the country where he's an oligarch?

Shooketh

[-] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 6 points 3 days ago

Can we ask Musk to volunteer to become the world's first recorded instance of a Mellified Man? Then science can determine if it's truly a medical marvel or not. He'll be the only one to have done it! I think his ego might go for that.

Plus it'll be sweeter when we eat him. Candied CEO sounds kinda good.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

LOL - surely the billionaire is going to be concerned about the plight of the American worker!?

The same guy that bought, then gutted, Xitter? Demanded people send him CODE for him to REVIEW?

I have some bad news for self-styled "Libertarians" that are also engineers...

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

That sweet, sweet H1B visa slavery

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 8 points 3 days ago

Rules for me not for thee does not work this way buddy.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2024
829 points (98.8% liked)

politics

19254 readers
2300 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS