750
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 days ago

Lemmy when discussing health care: Karl Marx

Lemmy when discussing creative works: Ayn Rand

[-] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago

It would sure be cool if all art could belong to all people.

Sadly, as long as we live in a profit driven system, there needs to be a way for artists to claim ownership over their work.

I don't see how people think this is any sort of slam dunk or how it could go against leftist principles.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] TheKingBombOmbKiller@lemm.ee 11 points 5 days ago

I don't know if Marx would disagree with individual artists owning the intellectual right to their artworks.

And if you asked Lemmy about how long copyright should last, I doubt that Ayn Rand would approve.

[-] Lennny@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Everything's just a retelling of Gilgamesh anyway, why bother protecting "originality"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] allo@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 days ago

because I don't make art to sell, I'd love to train an Ai on my pics or songs and then see what it can make when given cool prompts :)

But I'm far from the competitive capitalism scene so I more view such an activity with a sense of wonder instead of anything to do with a loss of paid work.

[-] laserm@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

Fuck AI art, honestly. I find the idea of using AI for instance in microbiology for finding combinations of proteins awesome, and so is it being used to help people learn and improve. For instance, when I don't understand concept in like math and engineering, I ask AI to give me advice. But using it for 'art' is honestly disgusting. It steals personality from art.

[-] allo@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

When I was making an android game I wanted to make art so i made an ai art gen on Perchance. OP would hate it most of all since a large part of it is the combining of different artist styles. I personally love being able to combine my 5 fav artists and see what prompts become with them combined.

I recently realized the artist Hannah Yata results in cool trippy pics. I then went to her site and yeah her pics are really like that. She's one of maybe 8 artists I've recently found a special connection to that I would not have known about otherwise.

so yeah ai art may be bad for struggling professional artists but for people that are not big money game studios yet, ai art basically allows having nonstockimage art in projects legally. I can 100% say ai art empowers me to have visuals where I could not have before unless i used stock(gross) images or had starting wealth to pay artists. So if you focus on artists losing, also focus on the poor but smart kid in some poverty place who is now that much more empowered to make something on their phone and legitly escape poverty.

There was a wealth barrier to visual art; now there isn't.

Entrenched struggling professional artists cry. People needing art that weren't wealthy enough to pay for it win.

When drugs become fabricateable at home by anyone, drug companies will also cry. People that weren't wealthy enough to pay for them win.

Same thing.

Poor artists.

But when you're the one no longer paywalled it's a different story.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] mhague@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago

I only consume garbage slop when it's manmade. A song with 57 kajillion views is real art. A movie with Dwayne Johnson is real art. Only rich people should be able to subject everyone to their limited imagination. Now that regular people can create slop my delicate capitalist machines that shit out content for me to consume are being disrupted. I'm too lazy and dumb to form personal connections with other humans so these fake ass systems are the only way I can get content. And you just can't tell if it's human anymore, it's so sad.

[-] Emerald@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

This is an interesting take honestly. A lot of art is made without much care or creativity. That isn't a bad thing. So why should AI "art" be considered inherently bad?

[-] Corno@lemm.ee 11 points 6 days ago

The way some people defend AI generated images reminds me of the way some people defend the act of tracing other people's art without the artist's permission and uploading it while claiming they made it.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] allo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

Honestly I think people should embrace their medium, whatever it is.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
750 points (92.6% liked)

196

16773 readers
2261 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS