774
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 28 points 4 days ago

If they are losing money on $200/month, that does not necessarily mean they lose money on the $20/month.

One is unlimited, the other is not. You only have to use the $200 subscription more than 10 times the amount the $20 subscription allows for OpenAI to earn less on that subscription.

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 4 days ago

We already know they're losing money on everything

[-] DavidGarcia@feddit.nl 35 points 5 days ago

really looking forward to how these multi-billion dollar AI datacenter investments will work out for big tech companies

that said I'm pretty sure most of that capacity is reserved for the surveillance state anyway

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lukewarm_ozone@lemmy.today 31 points 4 days ago

By "Sam Altman said" in a "series of posts", this article means these two tweets from 10 hours ago: https://twitter.com/sama/status/1876104580070813976.
This is a screenshot of a tweet talking about an article written about two tweets by Sam Altman. Is this really the world we're living in, now?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] stoicmaverick@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago

Can someone explain the Pale Horse reference?

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] ramble81@lemm.ee 27 points 4 days ago

Never offer unlimited on a utility model without guardrails. That’s just business 101.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
774 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1512 readers
252 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS