this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
930 points (97.6% liked)

Bluesky

1430 readers
88 users here now

People skeeting stuff.

Bluesky Social is a microblogging social platform being developed in conjunction with the decentralized AT Protocol. Previously invite-only, the flagship Beta app went public in February 2024. All are welcome!

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Don't normalize imperialistic ambitions as a way to appeal to fascists. Ukraine should be supported, but not because of the need to maintain the hegemony.

[–] mhague@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Down with American imperialism. Long live the imperialism of their successor!

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

So in response to my argument that you shouldn't directly encourage imperialism you're arguing "but my empire is better than their empire." How very... insightful. I understand that you believe imperialism is a fundamental reality of international politics, but it's only because of tact shit like this that defeats internationalism.

[–] mhague@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Well, "my empire is better" is a very good argument when discussing which empire should run the world.

There's only 3 choices for who gets the hegemony right now, or is my knowledge out of date? There's USA, China, and Russia.

Curious who should take over if Americans should let go.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago

Damn, I thought liberals were supposed to at least wear a mask.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

A power balance would be more beneficial than the US rampaging without countries having other imperialists to align with.

[–] mhague@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Do you think a power imbalance or global revolution as the other commenter implies is more likely to occur than another hegemony?

If they suddenly closed prisons I wouldn't be like "hell yeah, in a just world we wouldn't need prisons, nobody should have their freedom taken away." I'd be preoccupied with what I think is going to happen in this world.

Also, every single country engages in "imperialism." It's basic geopolitics. Simply trading with people gives you influence with them that you could potentially leverage. (Remember, this topic is about soft power and influence, which some people are calling imperialism. If it's confusing don't blame me.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

All it took was a few insatiably greedy assholes and a few decades. Hopefully the next government can figure out how to contend with human greed.

[–] Hikermick@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

If you think the disinformation was directed at "them", think again

[–] prinzmegahertz@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

Tbh it’s basically the movie 300 without king Leonidas.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago

Indeed and the fucking MAGAts are sucking down the Kremlin stirred Orange Kool-Aid.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›