this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
499 points (98.8% liked)

World News

44190 readers
3314 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump defended Russia's massive missile and drone attack on Ukraine that followed his administration's halt to intelligence sharing and military aid to Kyiv, saying Putin was "doing what anybody would do."

Trump told reporters he finds it "easier" to work with Russia than Ukraine, claiming Putin "wants to end the war."

While threatening vague sanctions against Russia on social media, Trump's actual actions have targeted Ukraine, including cutting off military supplies and disabling Ukraine's access to satellite imagery.

Ukrainian forces have reportedly suffered battlefield setbacks as a direct result of these U.S. policy changes.

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] otto@sh.itjust.works 157 points 1 week ago
[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 99 points 1 week ago

I wouldn't do that.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 89 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Okay let's game this out then. If you had a president who is stomping on your civil rights, tearing down the safety net, and crashing your economy - what is it that 'anyone would do'?

[–] troglodytis@lemmy.world 82 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Play Nintendo. I like the character that wears green

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Luigi

Weegee

Green Mario

L U I G I fucking M a n GiO N E

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago
[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Wait really? Since when? I've gotta try it now:

Luigi Mangione

Nope, that seems to work

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

Just saying a person's name isn't the threshold, this isn't reddit. But no, calling for violence on .world typically results in mod action.

[–] commander 0 points 1 week ago

Oof.

Glad I left that instance. Mods need to grow some spines and stop censoring things just because people complain.

We already have the tools to ignore others.

[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

Player 2 has entered the chat.

[–] MyDogLovesMe@lemmy.world 85 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Siding with the Russians.

Good God, America.

Look at yourself, FFS!

[–] Aux@feddit.uk 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] MyDogLovesMe@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wow! These guys are so blinded by their love of privilidge.

Trust me, you’d rather be a Dem.

Fucking clueless.

[–] Aux@feddit.uk 8 points 1 week ago

Mate, that was during Trump's first term. Trust me, they're better off in Russia.

[–] baratheon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

letting friends die for his proffit. hope he likes the smell of blood on his hands

Literally viewing the world like a EU4 map painting player would

[–] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So another way to read this is Trump admitting that he wants to invade Ukraine?

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 1 week ago

Yes when he sprung the bloody wedding type ambush on Zelensky. Right up to that moment his sycophants did not agree that he was on the fascist dictator's side, but since then they ofc all turned their coat because even their decades long chant of being world moral police it only took one self proclaimed Jesus to flip their whole purpose into violence. It's very sad and hard to belive

[–] schema@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Someone should ask him what he would do if Russia took Alaska.

[–] OnASnowyEvening@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Well, you'd have to ask, was there a reason they took Alaska? They might have a good reason. Maybe they think there was something wrong with how we bought it from them. They might feel we took advantage of them. I mean, wouldn't you sympathize with someone that felt taken advantage of? They'll have a good reason. Russia wouldn't do anything on a whim. Not just to enrich themselves or establish a beachhead for the rest of the continental Americas; surely not.

Of course... even if it were a beachhead... Russia might have a good reason, and we like Russia, they're good friends. Maybe we should join together in some kind of union...

/s

PS: If someone was nodding their head along with the above, just know you're on the wrong side of... well, everything.

[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

So he knew civilians would be killed by his actions and let it happen without any concern.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 week ago

Trump says Putin says

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

"... with the intel that we gave to them."

[–] Oomny@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sure....it's what anyone would do to defeat their enemies.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 1 week ago

No. Some would not invade and destroy a country and say "I want to end this war" while not honoring 24 ceasefires in a row continuing to bombard civilian targets.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Good luck dealing with a Mexican insurgency.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

I would heartily support one.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

mexico??? you know the panama/canada/greenland talk yeah.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's been a long standing right wing fantasy of sending the us military to deal with the cartels

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 1 points 1 week ago

Lol I like to toot that trump should deal with all these illegal immigrants by offering state hood to their countries but he won't. Why? Color scale.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Where are the shitty racist Ukrainian Brighton Beach Krasnov and Government of Putin supporters? They should volunteer for the Ukrainian infantry and see the results of their fucking vote.

[–] superflycrazy@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

the blue and yellow suit is beyond insulting. petty observation. shrug.