this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
21 points (100.0% liked)

RetroGaming

24395 readers
97 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Been trying to find something to play for hours and only getting blips now and then. I come to realize that I just stopped feeling anything nostalgic for some consoles from particular generations of gaming. One of them is the Sega Genesis. The only greatest memory I've had of that system, was the Sega Channel, a subscription service that gave you access to numerous Genesis games in a monthly cycle. I was really one of the blessed few that got to experience that and was so happy someone made a rom dump of it only to find that it only brings me to the ATTENTION! screen when I try running it. That's what you get when something happens to the adapter or service discontinued .etc

Anyways, I know the Genesis have had some gems and some classics. But I have a hard time really caring for most of its library and the way Sega has handled re-releasing its old games library, has really added sour to my feelings on the Genesis. Sonic, Golden Axe, Columns, Streets of Rage and repeat was all that Sega ever pitched out. Over and over, didn't matter what generation of gaming it was. Maybe a few random titles sprinkled in and there you go. But it's like, they didn't bother lifting a finger to try and maybe get some of the better games that were released on that system. They didn't get Shadowrun, which in my opinion, outclasses the SNES version just barely simply because it felt like a pure Shadowrun experience. Zombies Ate My Neighbors could have had an argument being compiled. Pirates! Gold was a stellar pirates-related RPG of its time, didn't get compiled.

Like what the fuck, Sega? Yes we get it, never forget Sonic. Between the two big 16-bit consoles, I've found greater appreciation for the SNES. I mean, you could easily rank 150 banger classics off of its library compared to what Genesis' best, I struggle to maybe get 20 or 25.

all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I never realized how much garbage was cranked out in the 8 bit era. Going back and firing up ROMs for games I had never played or even some that I used to enjoy, I discovered many of them to be unplayable.

Don't get me wrong, there are some bangers, but at least 75% of NES games are just crappy remakes of decent games.

[–] CaptnKarisma@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sega never had the appeal to me either man outside those few games. I still like playing the SNES for whatever reason they just seem to hold up

[–] quickenparalysespunk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

i agree. i think Sega more often tried to go for trends and edginess, or encouraged (passively or actively) devs to do so. the games became total ancient history, emotion-wise. compared to Big N, whose titles became seen as classics and are often imitated.

on some level, it's as simple as the colors being more primary and bright, versus secondary and dark. obviously not the only factor but an undeniable one.

edit: removed redundancy

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 4 months ago

I never had nostalgia for Sega. All the other kids were going crazy for Sonic and when I finally played it the best thing I could say about it was the graphics were nice, and the music was awesome. The game itself felt awful to play. The levels felt randomly generated at times. It was not even close to as tight in the actual gameplay as Super Mario.

How it became the big hit it is now makes no sense to me unless it really was just the marketing and "BLAST PROCESSING" made people think it was actually cooler than it was.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago

It might not actually be their game, by copyright sense? They might not see a point in hunting someone down, that may or may not exist, to ask them if they want to remake a game but get none of the profits. Ideally none.

Or these games weren't iconic enough to be checked off, on some survey to justify money being spent on it.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

The NES.

I remember a bunch of nonsensical or just plain frustrating games where you're lucky to get past level 1. It was fun as a kid when I was just screwing around. But SNES and Genesis felt like the beginning of the expectation that you play through the game or at least take them seriously.

[–] bambootstrap@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago

Grew up in the 16-bit generation and loved it but every time I fire up a retro emulator I can’t get past the graphics. Some things are just better off as memories.

[–] xye@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

Just chiming in to say the sega channel was fucking awesome, that was real future shit