this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
391 points (97.8% liked)

Fediverse memes

1071 readers
123 users here now

Memes about the Fediverse

Other relevant communities:

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

2/4 aint bad

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 66 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] 1984@lemmy.today 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That one is easy, any circle jerk that is also funny will do it.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

You seem to have a contradiction there.

[–] sober_monk@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Seeing your shitty meme reposted in another community

[–] afronaut@slrpnk.net 20 points 1 day ago

Not using Lemmy

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Remeber if you're a mod or admin to make a vague rule that you can use for whenever you feel like banning someone but they didn't break the rules!

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know you're joking but I honestly think vague rules are sometimes better, as long as they aren't abused like you say here. Overly specific rules have a tendency to lead to people looking for loopholes or being so long that people don't read them.

[–] OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Vague rules are power. Power corrupts. No anarchist should be creating vague rules. If they do, all other anarchists have the right to kick their shins

[–] match@pawb.social 5 points 1 day ago

There's a problem with specific rules in that a malicious actor can intentionally work to be a dick without breaking any of the exact rules. Which is why Don't Be A Dick is a reasonable rule.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Vague rules aren't more powerful than specific ones - any admin can just change their rules if they want or ban people anyway. You could have super specific rules and power abuse simultaneously easily.

I'm also not an anarchist anyway.

Vague rules hide and legitimise abuse of power.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 6 points 1 day ago

Then only refer to it by its code number.

Anyway, enjoy your 47 day ban from this community for breaking... checks notes... Rule 8. I'll save you the time looking it up, this time, it's: Don't be frivolous.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 30 points 2 days ago

Lemmy Instance Admins when their instance unexpectedly crashes and goes offline for more than four hours

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] crawancon@lemm.ee 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

the mauling bear are the user complaints and trolls.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The mauling bear swinging a human body around like a rag doll is when the instance suddenly and unexpectedly goes offline because of a major system crash.

[–] rikudou 7 points 1 day ago

Or as I like to call it, "an unexpected unpaid work in my free time."

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Which type of person is Jack next to the door in the water freezing to death?

Probably a Nicole DM victim.

[–] nutomic@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

Or a Lemmy developer.

[–] 5in1k@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

I comment here more than I did back on Reddit.

[–] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

At each stage you’re issued a new partner under 25 years old.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago

Mine must be lost in the post. I hope she's not stuck down the back of a filing cabinet in the sorting office only to be discovered when she is well past her use-by date (ie 25).

[–] iamai@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

It's just the name I think doesn't catch general users.. sorry, unpopular opinion maybe!

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

The database is a feisty one.