this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
1003 points (97.5% liked)

Showerthoughts

33123 readers
308 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

And I thought they were supposed to be shying away from fossil fuels.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 158 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Tesla owners going from "Look at me!" to "Stop looking at me!" in the blink of an eye.

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago (12 children)

if i were looking to fuck with a Tesla, i'd pay close attention to any indication that the car was purchased recently. there are a LOT of people out there with a murder fetish, and i GUARANTEE that a lot of the nice new ones out there are really bait cars for gun owners that have been dying for a reason to shoot someone.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, probably a lot of Rittenhouse wannabes out there who wanna test the limits of castle doctrine.

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (15 children)

yes, but this is a whole new monster..

  1. someone shoots a person who's defacing their Cybertruck
  2. they're convicted of murder because it's proven they bought the vehicle specifically to bait a victim
  3. Trump pardons them

i defy you to tell me that this isn't INEVITABLE.

[–] SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Man I don't even think step two would happen before trump pardons them. The US is so fucked.

EDIT: As an example of what you said, a sociopath who has recently bought a Tesla is the fucking president of the US

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Murder ia basically always handled at the state level, so Trump would not have power to pardon that crime.

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He doesnt have the power to do lots of things he is doing.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Tell you what's more likely? DeSantis or one of those babyfuckers will do it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 65 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (12 children)

I know it's a joke, but many Tesla "solar" charging stations did actually use diesel generators a few years ago. Citation needed, but I can't be assed to look up the article.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Still more energy efficient than a regular ICE car.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Debatable, it depends on what fraction of the power was supplied by the generator. The chemical-kinetic-electric energy conversion incurs great losses because of waste heat, and portable diesel generators are not always built with efficiency in mind. A charging station operating on 100% diesel to power an EV is much less efficient than a modern ICE vehicle of a similar mass sans batteries.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 week ago (29 children)

A charging station operating on 100% diesel to power an EV is much less efficient than a modern ICE vehicle of a similar mass sans batteries.

Citation needed. Do ICE engines not get hot and therefore also have great losses because of waste heat?

Presumably a generator making electricity for a charging station would only run when electricity is needed, while an ICE engine would be losing energy to heat the entire time the vehicle is idling in traffic.

Why would a diesel generator not be made to efficient and why are ICE engines always made to be efficient? How do you know which kind of generator they were using? Why would they use the generator for 100% of the energy needed?

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Keeping in mind that this is a hypothetical scenario and that I did point out that the overall efficiency is dependent on how much of the power is generated by renewables and how much by the on-site diesel generator:

  • An ICE skips the conversion to electricity and its storage. Losses and losses.
  • An ICE vehicle weighs less than an EV of a similar size because it doesn't have batteries (see this chart to compare the energy density (MJ/kg, horizontal axis) of lithium batteries to gasoline and diesel)
  • There is a point in the diesel/solar ratio at which the system's overall efficiency is higher with an EV than an ICE, but I don't know where that is because, once again, you're pissing yourself over a hypothetical scenario.
[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It doesn't really matter actually. Electric motors are so much better at delivering power, that you will get more range from a gallon of gas by towing an 'flat battery' EV behind a truck and then driving the EV than you will just driving the truck without towing the EV.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)
[–] ascense@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

Last I ran the numbers, it seemed like on paper charging off an industrial scale generator was around 20-30% more fuel efficient per km than directly running an ICE car, but I based it on the advertised efficiency values of a random average seeming diesel car, compared to rather pessimistic charging loss and efficiency numbers for the EV. The inefficiency of even modern ICE cars is quite astonishing, even compared to the engine in a generator that can constantly run at the optimal RPM and load for efficiency.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Teslas don't run on gasoline.

It runs on them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Icalasari@fedia.io 23 points 1 week ago

I am so slow lately I saw this yesterday and only just now got the joke

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Let's focus on the nazi leader also not only his old projects

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 week ago

His stock in Tesla is leveraged for a lot of other things he does. Lowering the stock value could cripple him financially.

[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Run Tesla stock prices into the ground. It's legal and, short of criminal violence, it would damage Elon worse than anything else. Without his money, Elmo Muskrat would just be the guy at the end of a dive bar you avoid because all they talk about is government conspiracies to cover up the fact that Lizard People Aliens are making human lizard people hybrids.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] db2@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

He loves t' slur, what's unclear?

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Actually burning Teslas is bad for the environment.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

Drop in the bucket compared to what enabling this billionaire shit bag is going to do.

[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

So make sure people are afraid to buy one.

[–] Mandelbrot@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You don't have to use fossil fuels. Just pointing out.

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is America. We use corn based moonshine here.

[–] don@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Tito’s Vodka is distilled from corn.

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (8 children)

today i learned! the defining characteristic of vodka isn’t the raw ingredient but rather the distillation and filtration process that makes it a neutral spirit.

according to the U.S. TTB (Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau) and the EU regulations, vodka is:

  • a neutral spirit distilled to at least 95% ABV (190 proof) and then diluted to no less than 37.5% ABV (EU) or 40% ABV (U.S.) before bottling
  • usually filtered, often through charcoal, to remove impurities and flavors
  • can be made from any fermentable sugar or starch—grains (wheat, rye, corn), potatoes, grapes, even milk whey
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›