this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
87 points (96.8% liked)

World News

36879 readers
1231 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] maporita@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Both Russia and Ukraine have been using Soviet-era cluster bombs. Ukraine has asked America to supply dual-purpose improved conventional munitions (DPICM), a class of cluster munition that could be fired from howitzers or from the himarsrocket launchers that Ukraine has been receiving for around a year. They have the added benefit of fewer duds so that risk to future civilian populations is reduced.

[–] Spacebar@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Are these bad because they litter the land with unexploded ordinance? Or is there another reason?

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

That’s my understanding. I recall reading that Ukraine has argued this isn’t much of an issue as the south and East of Ukraine are already littered with a huge amount of UXO and mines so it really doesn’t change the calculus in terms of cleanup.

[–] LeZero@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Yes, since 1979 UXO (mostly cluster munitions there) caused 64000 casualties and 25000 amputations in just Cambodia

Since 1974, 50000 casualties in Laos

This kind of UXO are especially a risk for children

[–] Sauvandu59@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

not surprised, both side have been using cluster munitions for a while.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

... cluster bombs suck. But when the land is already basically one gigantic minefield, whatever.

My apologies to the ghost of Princess Di, she was a nice lady. But this is a war.

[–] Anonymoose@infosec.pub 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's the next generation of future amputees and casualties that'll bear the weight of these unexploded cluster munitions.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago
load more comments
view more: next ›