this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
804 points (98.7% liked)

Murdered by Words

1936 readers
17 users here now

Responses that completely destroy the original argument in a way that leaves little to no room for reply - a targeted, well-placed response to another person, organization, or group of people.

The following things are not grounds for murder:

Rules:

  1. Be civil and remember the human. No name calling or insults. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone else.
  2. Discussion is encouraged but arguments are not. Don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.
  3. No bigotry of any kind.
  4. Censor the person info of anyone not in the public eye.
  5. If you break the rules you’ll get one warning before you’re banned.
  6. Enjoy the community in the light hearted way it’s intended.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Walking in with my pants rolled up to mid-calf and the knees busted out like I've been giving head at the local truck stop for the last three weeks. I've got a full head of hair, yet I insist on shaving everything but the crown. I absolutely cannot grow a beard, and I refuse to get a proper shave. I'm wearing a watch in the year 2025, purely to show off how much money I can throw at one of the only allowed men's accessories. Neck. Tattoos. There's a 50/50 chance I'm wearing socks.

The entire cast of the Jersey Shore is lining up to get my number. Everyone else is staying at the distance necessary not to smell the patchouli.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Short socks make me feel gross

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 3 points 2 days ago

Yeah, I don't like the texture difference when both my bare and clothed feed touch the shoe.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)
  • You will have my sword
  • And my axe
  • And my bow
  • I'm looking for Horcruxes
[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

Holy shit that's funny

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Their arms are as big as their thigh. How can you even do that?

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

Skipping leg day

[–] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They are suffering from Upside-Down Light Bulb Syndrome.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

the pants look like they'll rip any second

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PNW_Doug@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Because I'm 55 years old and would—shockingly—even appear more of a buffoon than they?

Seems like a fairly good reason to me.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Personally for me I have massive legs even without working out( benefits of overweight with the right genetics) and I can't get the skinny jeans past my calves. 🤷‍♂️

It would also look ridiculous on me.

I would never wear long jeans that are not long enough and low socks to expose my ankles, that would feel terrible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 days ago

Guy on the left looks good to me honestly. The other three take it too far for my tastes but Lefty's hot

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

They give off dbag vibes

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

My curves are in different places

[–] discreetelite@feddit.uk 6 points 2 days ago

The one lad has gone baggy what is he hiding

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 7 points 2 days ago

Totally not gay, bro

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Because I'm not into CBT.

[–] notasquirrel@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago

what is this? the tight pants convention?

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Showing off those sexy ankles would've gotten them in quite the pickle back in the late 1800s.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

You can almost tell their religion be a their pants are so tight

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

If you consider round a shape I’d totally wear that

[–] baggins@beehaw.org 2 points 2 days ago

Because I'm 68 years old.

[–] lath@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I have blue jeans like those and they're actually quite snug.

But I also have baggy jeans with large pockets and they give me the feeling of unlimited power.

[–] undecidedyellow@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (3 children)

As a woman who's had limited access to pockets for most of her life, why would anyone willingly choose to give up proper pants storage? Clearly, these men don't realize how privileged their existence has been.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 2 days ago

Sometimes tight trousers have excellent pockets (menswear doesn't give a toss about pockets ruining the line of the clothing, even on skin tight clothing), like the man in the op photo with his phone deep in his right pocket

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

And this is why I wear baggy cargo pants/shorts. I have 8 pockets, but only use maybe three at the most. Muwhahaha. Be jealous. 🤴

[–] lath@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Yeah, losing pockets is a trade-off I don't always like. But some situations requires freedom of movement and the skintight pants are more aerodynamic. However I'm not into leggings, so jeans will do.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›