337

Senate Democrats said Monday they plan to subpoena Republican megadonor Harlan Crow and conservative activist Leonard Leo for more information about their roles in organizing and paying for luxury travel for Supreme Court justices.

The announcement by Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee comes as the court is being pressed to adopt an ethics code, a move that has been publicly endorsed by three of the nine justices.

The committee could act as soon as next week to authorize Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., the panel’s chairman, to issue subpoenas to Crow, Leo and another wealthy donor, Robin Arkley II.

Crow has been identified as a benefactor of Justice Clarence Thomas for more than two decades, paying for nearly annual vacations, purchasing from Thomas and others the Georgia home in which the justice’s mother still lives and helping pay for the private schooling for a relative.

all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 18_24_61_b_17_17_4@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Oh, my sweet Summer child. These men will never testify, they're Republicans after all. Subpoenas are for the poor who can't afford lawyers to fight them.

Republicans get out of any and all Congressional subpoenas by invoking the magic words "not a valid legislative purpose".

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Did you take this trip purchased by funds tied to your name?

“I do not recall”

[-] TunaCowboy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Oh, my sweet Summer child.

This is such a douchey fucking phrase, certainly you can find a less obnoxious way to condescend.

[-] money_loo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

This is such a douchey fucking phrase, certainly you can find a less obnoxious way to condescend.

Bless your heart.

[-] crandlecan@mander.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

A stern warning at least. Maybe even a pointed finger!!

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Fined for conduct, maximum fine of $8.

[-] crandlecan@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Those harsh punishments never work and usually backfire. He needs to be able to build towards his future. Taking everything one can brings forth misery. See the rise of Nazi Germany for example! Instead, we need to reach out and listen, cross the bridge 🙏

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

$8 fine appealed by crandlecan (the can of a cranberry candle).

Granted. Fine reduced to $2, plus two book deals, a miniseries, and a movie based on defendant - scripts and content will be approved by defendant and allies

[-] crandlecan@mander.xyz 0 points 1 year ago

That sounds fair and balanced 😂

[-] autotldr 3 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


WASHINGTON (AP) — Senate Democrats said Monday they plan to subpoena Republican megadonor Harlan Crow and conservative activist Leonard Leo for more information about their roles in organizing and paying for luxury travel for Supreme Court justices.

The announcement by Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee comes as the court is being pressed to adopt an ethics code, a move that has been publicly endorsed by three of the nine justices.

The committee could act as soon as next week to authorize Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., the panel’s chairman, to issue subpoenas to Crow, Leo and another wealthy donor, Robin Arkley II.

Leo, a Federalist Society executive who worked with former President Donald Trump to move the court and the rest of the federal judiciary to the right, and Arkley helped arrange and pay for a private jet trip to Alaska for Justice Samuel Alito in 2008.

Crow “offered to produce certain limited information that fell well short of what the Committee needs and to which it is entitled,” Durbin and Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., said in a joint statement.

The bill would set ethics rules for the court and a process to enforce them, including new standards for transparency around recusals, gifts and potential conflicts of interest.


The original article contains 427 words, the summary contains 208 words. Saved 51%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] bquintb@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago
[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

If bribery is still a crime, don't expect a lot of answers

this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
337 points (99.7% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3039 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS