this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
334 points (96.1% liked)

AskUSA

516 readers
4 users here now

About

Community for asking and answering any question related to the life, the people or anything related to the USA. Non-US people are welcome to provide their perspective! Please keep in mind:

  1. !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world - politics in our daily lives is inescapable, but please post overtly political things there rather than here
  2. !flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com - similarly things with the goal of overt agitation have their place, which is there rather than here

Rules

  1. Be nice or gtfo
  2. Discussions of overt political or agitation nature belong elsewhere
  3. Follow the rules of discuss.online

Sister communities

  1. !askuk@feddit.uk
  2. !casualuk@feddit.uk
  3. !casualconversation@lemm.ee
  4. !yurop@lemm.ee
  5. !esp@lemm.ee

Related communities

  1. !asklemmy@lemmy.world
  2. !asklemmy@sh.itjust.works
  3. !nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
  4. !showerthoughts@lemmy.world
  5. !usa@ponder.cat

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Banned is maybe too far, but why should we as a country allow people to have petty power over meaningless things their neighbors do? Could we ban HOAs from being included in house sales, and every time it's sold the new owners have to opt in?

For the most part, I'm wondering about this in the context of single family homes since for homes like condos, you could make the case that HOAs are useful for shared things like roofs and whatnot. Maybe limit mandatory HOA involvement to things like what's truly necessary and shared and not how tall your grass is?

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Vaggumon@lemm.ee 3 points 5 days ago

Absolutely.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

I think a small community being able to have say in who moves in, asking contract term violators to leave in exceptional cases, while still being liable for discriminatory actions, can be a good thing. However, being able to fine members and repossess their property? That should be 100,000,000% illegal.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago

for regular ass house on a regular ass street, yes. exceptions are made for condominiums, apartment complexes and gated communities.

[–] Talaraine@fedia.io 3 points 6 days ago

Waiting for the inevitable showdown over having hens in your backyard. Instant solution to the egg problem.

[–] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago

I mean I highly dislike them but also feel like many people like them for the exact reasons I dislike them.

[–] sigmabot@crazypeople.online 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

if you cant even decide what color your house is, you dont own it.

youre LARPing as a home owner while a Kouncil of Karens could evict you from the house you supposedly own.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

so if i can't paint a massive realistic dick on my house, i don't own it? you sound like a very pleasant neighbour

[–] sigmabot@crazypeople.online 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

so if i can’t paint a massive realistic dick on my house, i don’t own it? you sound like a very pleasant neighbour

but youre the one painting dicks on your house?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago
[–] mindaika@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

They’re already opt-in: you opt-in when you choose to buy a home with an HOA

Also you can’t “ban HOAs.” It’s a contract you agree to when buying a house

[–] shani66@ani.social 1 points 5 days ago

Just like getting insurance is opt in. Sure you can technically opt out, but in reality that's not how it works.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 6 days ago

Conceptually great idea but they have people involved and people suck.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›