this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2025
86 points (100.0% liked)

Wikipedia

2770 readers
159 users here now

A place to share interesting articles from Wikipedia.

Rules:

Recommended:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] paequ2@lemmy.today 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So the ol' shoelace and tin can phones actually work?? 😮

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No, this is literally connecting 2 microphones/speakers (they are the same).

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Which, come to think of it, is essentially the tin can method, just with conversion to an electrical signal that preserves fidelity over longer distances than kinetic vibrations on a string.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, if we ignore everything... you get sound from A to B. Essentially like a smartphone :D

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Lol look I’m all for pointless belligerence and poindextering online, and do it myself often, but (a) I’m gonna go out on a limb and say commenter above probably doesn’t think they’re actually the same, and regardless (b) things don’t have to be precisely the same to make abstract comparisons that aid understanding or help learn something new.

For example, your smartphone comparison. Some have a programmable RF transponder that passively converts a nearby RF pulse into a digital reply. They can read other transponders as well. If you and a friend agreed on a cipher, you could pretend to be secret agents by taking turns programming a brief “text,” switching off the device and leaving it on your desk for the other to scan as they pass by. It’s bidirectional and point to point with passive transmission, but it’s wireless and powered by electromagnetic waves rather than acoustic :D see? It’s fun.

Edit: spelling