this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2025
24 points (96.2% liked)

Typography

287 readers
7 users here now

Type design, setting, fonts, etc.

Civility is aggressively enforced: do not be rude, troll-y, flame-bait-y, etc. If someone else is, please report, block as necessary, and move on.

Comments that cannot reasonably lead to discussion or which have no analysis ("first!", "lol", [string of emojis]) will be deleted. Please do not post them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 5 points 2 months ago

Omg, that was a great laugh. Thank you!

[–] SpatchyIsOnline@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This is false, you cannot copyright a typeface. The only part of a font that is covered under copyright is the "software" i.e. the font file itself. Using a typeface in a video (or anywhere that's not redistributing the file) is completely within your (or anyone's) rights.

More info here: https://youtu.be/J06tluN7rtE

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

They didn’t say they violated copyright, and they specifically call it out that it was a clone, not anything illegal. It’s just ironic to do so for this specific case.

[–] koavf@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

What is "false"? The article doesn't mention the word "copyright" at all.